Quote:
Originally Posted by krux
Thats the key question, but it doesn't seem to be the case here
|
It isn't as all the money he's put in is in the form of shares.
Apparently he's not asking for any money for his shares either so the future of the club depends on the intentions of the new owner and how big his pockets are.
I suppose that's the difference between the likes of Eastleigh and us.
If a sugar daddy pulled out and left us with shareholder's funds of £2.5m, we could cut our cloth accordingly and manage just fine while someone with the fan base of Eastleigh could end up going bust in a couple of seasons if they didn't cut costs dramatically.
Big question is though is why do all the sugar daddies support tin pot clubs?