Quote:
Originally Posted by GiggityGiggityGiggityGoo
The WST preferred local only and chased off anyone else. Fans camped outside a perspective buyers home until he pulled out because he want local.
When I say trust warned on Moss, it's in relation to splitting assets, by some within the WST hence me saying they kept driving in a wedge between both sides complicating things further.
Of course they backed them, they invited them to make a bid, backed their ownership bid and splitting of assets, don't try to rewrite history.
You don't believe they couldn't have done a leveraged buyout? It was the WST who dreamt up what became Wrexham Village, throw in the income generated from the membership plus flats and it seems feasible to me.
I don't make out anything either, but you're a fan of using such tactics when things get uncomfortable.
Also ask yourself why Dickens left around 18 months after the takeover like he promised his consortium would, expect Moss never did not put the shares up for sale. Tells you all you need to know about Moss and if I remember correctly that was before the assets were split, yet it was still backed.
|
Firstly, things are not uncomfortable for me. I am entirely happy with the ownership of my football club. You’re not and that’s your problem.
The Trust were never in a position to buy the club when it had land. When it was
just a football club leveraged in debt could the trust take over.
If what you say about the trust supporting the Wrexham village model ownership, this could have only have been for the benefit of the football club. We can all talk in hindsight but in my opinion, once Wrexham village was created, it’s significantly diminished Wrexham football club.
Perhaps something we can seemingly agree on is the type of person Geoff Moss is/was whilst at Wrexham football club. My principal memories of his tenure were:
a) loans against assets (land);
b) trying to get hold of the Trust’s £300k; and
c) not selling shares to the Trust.