Quote:
Originally Posted by KingBuxton_Forever red
Of course we want better players than him, but you have to balance the books. Cant sign a squad of top earners.
You say we CAN, but I bet McGlashan would command a higher wage than him, and I think Rutherford is actually better.
|
You assume better players would cost more. This isn't necessarily the case, but that would come down to having a good scouting network which I don't think we have.
Why for example can't we get a younger player with potential rather than throwing more contracts at players already proven not to be good enough? Why anyone would want a ineffective winger that doesn't create or score is beyond me whatever money they earn, the end result is the same.