Quote:
Originally Posted by Phils-an-alki
It should also work both ways, especially seeing as the two boards (WST and Club) can't even sort their own house out in respect of leaking information etc. And they can't even come clean about that. The hypocrisy is truly staggering.
|
It's not at all. Unilateral or ‘one-way’ NDAs are quite standard. I deal with them all the time.
Bilateral NDAs require negotiation and agreement between the two parties before coming into force. Not really possible in the type of situation we are talking about, and it would potentially cost our club a lot of money. What would we gain from that?
Bryn Law's proposal is unworkable and will encourage chancers to try their luck. The whole point of the NDA is that it offers protection to us. A serious bidder for the club will never need to worry about it because they will never break the NDA.