Quote:
Originally Posted by Prodigal Dragon
My understanding is he is there solely to improve comms, and is not part of the executive. There are pros and cons to this, but I would be both surprised and angry if he had a vote.
|
If it was after he was co-opted and appointed as a director then he had a legal right to vote.
Whether we yet needed another board member is another matter as also is his performance in that role. He can't even get a kick off time right.