Quote:
Originally Posted by Inside Left
From your experience and reading would any move for a change of the 49% require 75% of members to agree as it is a change in the constitution? The secretary stated that the 75% is there for good reason quoting 'preventing schisims ' (divisions).
I have a feeling that nothing can change because the trust relies on the general apathy of the membership.
|
Any constitutional change requires a 75% vote to pass it.
As far as I'm aware the club has only got the Gateway process in place to vet "Investors". A new mandate is require to sanction a sale, or negotiate a sale.
It all comes back to the membership at an EGM anyway.
It does however require more active members to vote.
A proposal to sell the club would surely be a catalyst for engagement.