Quote:
Originally Posted by Red_Jackoisback
Would imagine voters would want to know this before they vote and would ask the question prior. This vote is a vote to progress the deal to contract and the information is skeleton terms. The majority of the spend is in two years. People need to understand that this is a vote to proceed to progress the deal
|
The monies needed and where it's envisaged it will come from still needs to be stated, even if it's a loan from a fan. Will it eat into 'competitive' playing budget.
It's all very deciteful like the vote on the Racecourse lease IMO.