Quote:
Originally Posted by crazywelsh
It’s all going to go tits up, the quiet spell now alongside Crewe reds comments.
LJ was brought back for a purpose, the bid being on the table was that actual purpose. He knows the constitution and knows it’s a shield for fan ownership, it’s no coincidence that certain pro WST fans spoke about the constitution and selling would violate the constitution, it’s almost asif a preservation of power clause was intended.
We chose fan ownership, as we had no other choice, but who decided the club needed a constitution?
|
A lot of individuals know the constitution.
That's the rules by which the trust run the club and was verified by the members.
There may well be a problem that a challenge could be made to a sale by using the constitution but by the same token the members could decide to change or remove the relevant clauses at an EGM.
It would even be possible to do this at the Extraordinary meeting to accept a bid if the details were acceptable.
2 Proposals linked to each other. First one changes the constitution, Second vote, if first one passes, to accept the offer.