Quote:
Originally Posted by Phils-an-alki
People crying its got personal are talking rubbish. Its in the public for anyone to see. No one has made it personal at all. People are taking the piss because his profile is so far away from reality its laughable. Plus he walked out on the club so anyone making out he's some sort of club legend is desperately clutching at straws.
Also the club got personal with fans by contacting their employers, kicking the DSA out and then lying about it (amongst a whole host of other things) so they are all fair game now. They're lucky not to be run out of town after what they've done and should be grateful we weren't as militant and law breaking as they were when they disliked the people who ran the club. No one cried its getting personal then did they?
|
Do we know who was actually responsible for contacting employers? For me, that is utterly deplorable. I don't recall voting for
that.
Whilst the inner circle of the Trust have been good at leaking secrets, perhaps they could leak who it was who contacting some employers of supporters.
Out of interest and merely trying to add balance to the argument; would it be fair if the LinkedIn profiles of supporters were posted and discussed on RP?
My view is that whilst it is all publicly accessible, it straddles the line. We only have to look at the league table and assess the team's performance to criticise the manager without pulling apart his LinkedIn profile too.
Finally, it wasn't Keates that was responsible for (alleged) personal attacks by the Trust on supporters. Perhaps the LinkedIn profiles of senior Trust members should be posted in the interests of fairness.