Quote:
Originally Posted by TheRealWelshWayne
The real reason for not having a SGM..
From the rules...
"63. One third of the members of the Society Board elected by the members who have served
the longest at the date of the annual general meeting will resign. If at any time the number
of elected directors is not divisible by three, the Society Board shall decide the number of
elected directors to resign in accordance with this rule, which shall be approximately one
third of the total number."
If no SGM, only two of them will have to put themselves up for election at the agm in June.
If an SGM, four of them would have to put themselves up for election at the AGM in June.
Corrupt.
|
We have known it’s been corrupt for years, the trust would be better stating how many members are left. I can’t see there being many as the new owners amassed 5000 members in less than 3 days ... the trust had what 400 members vote at most until a vote on selling came.
It’s time for it to end, if it’s needed again in the future it can just start again.
There’s no power involved, the standard of person interested will be of a lower standard than any previous interest as there’s no real decisions to be made. I honestly don’t see why they haven’t closed. There’s no real purpose to continue when there are individual supporter groups are still functioning and the club has its own.
Either completely rebranding the wst might help it’s current position, a name change and a clear out of dead wood. But it still doesn’t divert that there’s no power in any role the wst offer.