Louis Moult

[stanvax]

Still think he'll end up at Derby County

[El Jonez]

Originally Posted by Phils-an-alki

Mills didn't let Moult go, it was Moult's decision and the club got a fee. I'm no Mills fan but don't see how he should take flak for that and Gray started off quite well for us.
To be fair Gray was a lot closer ability wise to Moult then Bishop was. I mean Bishop FFS.

I still haven't got over this as you can see.

At the Open Day ahead of that season, I was in the group being taken around, and we stopped off in the Directors Lounge for a talk from Spencer Harris.

An inquisitive fan (not me) asked Spencer why we sold Louis Moult and he said that it was Mills decision to sell him (not the clubs, as we didn't need the money).

Spencer also said the board backed the manager fully and he clearly stated that Mills believed his replacement (James Gray) was a better player.

This is not fiction, as I heard this myself.

[Phils-an-alki]

Originally Posted by El Jonez

At the Open Day ahead of that season, I was in the group being taken around, and we stopped off in the Directors Lounge for a talk from Spencer Harris.

An inquisitive fan (not me) asked Spencer why we sold Louis Moult and he said that it was Mills decision to sell him (not the clubs, as we didn't need the money).

Spencer also said the board backed the manager fully and he clearly stated that Mills believed his replacement (James Gray) was a better player.

This is not fiction, as I heard this myself.

This suggests it was Moults decision. Not doubting what you are saying mind..

Louis Moult leaves Wrexham FC with a heavy heart - Daily Post

[smiffysarmy]

I think he would have left anyway, with or without any influence from Mills.

I dont blame him though obviously.

[Leighton Red]

If I were Moult I wouldn't be signing an extension for little more money when there are loads of much bigger clubs hiding in the shadows waiting to pounce. Shame for us really as guess we get less if he's sold on the cheap due to only having less than 12 months left on his contract or worse moves on out of contract! If he was out of contract would we get anything (know it sounds stupid but would there have been a clause put in for this?)??

[pagl]

Originally Posted by Funny_Old_Game

And signed Dan Holman then never played him.
Posted via mobile theme

The question was whether Wilkin really signed him though.

Be nice to see Moult move to Derby for a couple of Mill£££££

[Rainfordred]

Originally Posted by Leighton Red

If I were Moult I wouldn't be signing an extension for little more money when there are loads of much bigger clubs hiding in the shadows waiting to pounce. Shame for us really as guess we get less if he's sold on the cheap due to only having less than 12 months left on his contract or worse moves on out of contract! If he was out of contract would we get anything (know it sounds stupid but would there have been a clause put in for this?)??

If he's out of contract, no contract exists - can't have a clause in something that doesn't exist..
Posted via mobile theme

[B10Red]

Tbh Motherwell are skint, like most Scottish clubs outside the top 4, and will probably take what they can get for him. Probably £500k seems reasonable, but lets hope Rangers decide to go crazy again and spend a few million

[Leighton Red]

Originally Posted by Rainfordred

If he's out of contract, no contract exists - can't have a clause in something that doesn't exist..
Posted via mobile theme

No contract between player and Motherwell perhaps but surely there must have been a contractual agreement between Motherwell and Wrexham from the original transfer??