Re: Is that it for signings?
[QUOTE=Colonel D;2052566]He is an attacking midfielder.[/QUOTE]
Im sure Fylde signed him as a striker. He's a big lad and I think he'd be a good signing. |
Re: Is that it for signings?
[QUOTE=Old Paddock Man;2052570]I think we are almost done apart from a striker. And DK won't get one just for the sake of it. Big couple of games for Jimmy. Needs to play the full 90 and convert some chances.[/QUOTE]
Jimmy has to go for me...we don't need striker's who cant hit a barn door. |
[QUOTE=dixienormous;2052574]Im sure Fylde signed him as a striker. He's a big lad and I think he'd be a good signing.[/QUOTE]
Is it the same Bradley that played with boden at alfreton ? [size=1][i]Posted via mobile theme[/i][/size] |
Re: Is that it for signings?
[QUOTE=dixienormous;2052575]Jimmy has to go for me...we don't need striker's who cant hit a barn door.[/QUOTE]
Is he is in the squad today? |
Re: Is that it for signings?
[QUOTE=standingroomonly2;2052576]Is it the same Bradley that played with boden at alfreton ?
[size=1][i]Posted via mobile theme[/i][/size][/QUOTE] He'll probably go back to Alfreton, if Fylde let him go, seems to lack a bit of ambition tbh |
Re: Is that it for signings?
I reckon a striker on Monday or early next week.
We don't need another midfielder - a scoring striker is massive priority now. The Fylde lad has been a free spirit for some weeks now - perhaps he will be fixed up at Solihull Moors ? |
Re: Is that it for signings?
He requires a fee , the only player we should be paying a fee for now is a centre forward.
[size=1][i]Posted via mobile theme[/i][/size] |
Re: Is that it for signings?
[QUOTE=dixienormous;2052575]Jimmy has to go for me...we don't need striker's who cant hit a barn door.[/QUOTE]
I think he's got something. And he's different to the other three. Obviously he needs to score but so far we've invested in experience which won't have been cheap. There might be space for taking a punt on someone. If they are cheap. Maybe as an impact sub. Just my thoughts. DK might well see it differently but he hasn't ditched him yet so presumably he sees something in him. |
Re: Is that it for signings?
In talks with a striker, hoping to agree something next week. No idea on names I am afraid.
[size=1][i]Posted via mobile theme[/i][/size] |
Re: Is that it for signings?
It's a shame Solihull signed Jermaine Hylton, I think he'll be up there as one of the top scorers next season.
[size=1][i]Posted via mobile theme[/i][/size] |
Re: Is that it for signings?
Provideing we sign a decent proven striker and have enough left in budget I wouldn't see a problem in giving jimmy a contract he would be good coming off the bench in games we are winning as he is direct could be useful in counter atacks
|
Re: Is that it for signings?
[QUOTE=flintred1983;2052615]Provideing we sign a decent proven striker and have enough left in budget I wouldn't see a problem in giving jimmy a contract he would be good coming off the bench in games we are winning as he is direct could be useful in counter atacks[/QUOTE]
But that would mean Boden Holroyd Potential new signing Massanka Gime That seems a bit too much for a club at our level and how are you gonna keep em all happy? |
Re: Is that it for signings?
[QUOTE=blackbrookred;2052590]In talks with a striker, hoping to agree something next week. No idea on names I am afraid.
[size=1][i]Posted via mobile theme[/i][/size][/QUOTE] Mackail-Smith I'd hope... |
Re: Is that it for signings?
[QUOTE=JonWrexhamfc;2052652]Mackail-Smith I'd hope...[/QUOTE]
He's finished now |
Re: Is that it for signings?
[QUOTE=smiffysarmy;2052655]He's finished now[/QUOTE]
Better off signing Mel Smith. |
Re: Is that it for signings?
he's dead !
|
All times are WMT (Wrexham Mean Time). For non-town viewers the time now is 12.47:50. |
Powered by vBulletin® & Wrex the Dragons fiery breath