Macclesfield reaction - RedPassion.co.uk

Redted · 5th August 2017, 16.00:09

Just left the game. Poor first half a bit better second. Massanka was very poor. Boden had some good touches but looks lazy. Wedbury looks a decent player. Kelly was our best player.Best team won. Not sure if their goal was deflected it was a good shot but Dunn should have done better.. Not sure why he played Carrington in the centre.Rutherfotd had a good game. Early day's though. Apologise for the dodgy spelling texting whilst walking

shimosays · 5th August 2017, 16.11:17

The ball moved like a beach ball for their goal - so much movement, not surprised Dunn couldn't get to it.
Posted via mobile theme

benwilliams · 5th August 2017, 16.12:27

Macc wi be lower mid table, they did nothing except the freak goal. We look fine in defence, the rest looked v poor. Big improvement needed on Tuesday, hope we sign this striker and don't start Rutherford and Carrington.
Posted via mobile theme

WV1 · 5th August 2017, 16.14:56

Didn't think it was that bad to be honest.

We'll win more than we'll lose this season.

Crewered · 5th August 2017, 16.14:58

Agree with that! Defence solid the rest poop

WAFCExile · 5th August 2017, 16.18:35

It wasn't great, but it wasn't terrible. Too many backs to goal in midfield. When we did create chances from crosses, they weren't finished. Macclesfield did almost nothing apart from the goal, which was Dunn's error. Ref didn't help. Still disappointing, but at least there's promise. Rutherford MoM for me.
Posted via mobile theme

Foxy · 5th August 2017, 16.18:38

Not bad when players in midfield pushed forward in the second half. In the first half wedgebury and Carrington were both playing too deep. Some serious questions though:

Why did we spend money on a mediocre right back who isn't as good as Carrington ?

Why is Carrington first choice in midfield when it's been shown on many occasions that that isn't his position ? The fact that he plays the same sitting role as Wedgebury makes this even more baffling ?

Deeside Dragon · 5th August 2017, 16.19:12

Not going to get to disheartened after 1 match, but we've got a few tricky matches coming up against sides who are likely to midway. If is't more of the same then I'll worry.

NedStarksGhost · 5th August 2017, 16.19:49

Potential is there. Wasn't expecting a win. Some great movement and link up play. Final third needs a fair bit of work. But feel fairly positive going forward.

Kelly is wasted on the wing though.

5th August 2017, 16.00:09	#1-0 (permalink)
Redted Legend Joined: Mar 2005 Racecourse Spot: G U Stand Real Name: Twitter: @	Macclesfield reaction Just left the game. Poor first half a bit better second. Massanka was very poor. Boden had some good touches but looks lazy. Wedbury looks a decent player. Kelly was our best player.Best team won. Not sure if their goal was deflected it was a good shot but Dunn should have done better.. Not sure why he played Carrington in the centre.Rutherfotd had a good game. Early day's though. Apologise for the dodgy spelling texting whilst walking __________________ "The night when it was confirmed that Wrexham could no longer preserve their league status was one of the saddest of my life" Mickey Thomas - Kickups, Hiccups, Lockups Last edited by Redted; 5th August 2017 at 16.08:01..

5th August 2017, 16.11:17	#2-0 (permalink)
shimosays First Teamer (info 1 & 2) Joined: Mar 2006 Racecourse Spot: Paddock Real Name: Thomas Shimmin Twitter: @shimosays	Re: Macclesfield reaction The ball moved like a beach ball for their goal - so much movement, not surprised Dunn couldn't get to it. Posted via mobile theme

5th August 2017, 16.12:27	#3-0 (permalink)
benwilliams Taking coaching badges Joined: Oct 2004 Racecourse Spot: MRS Real Name: Twitter: @	Re: Macclesfield reaction Macc wi be lower mid table, they did nothing except the freak goal. We look fine in defence, the rest looked v poor. Big improvement needed on Tuesday, hope we sign this striker and don't start Rutherford and Carrington. Posted via mobile theme

5th August 2017, 16.14:56	#4-0 (permalink)
WV1 Cult Hero Joined: Mar 2015 Racecourse Spot: none given Real Name: none given Twitter: @	Re: Macclesfield reaction Didn't think it was that bad to be honest. We'll win more than we'll lose this season.

5th August 2017, 16.14:58	#5-0 (permalink)
Crewered Squad Player Joined: Oct 2015 Racecourse Spot: none given Real Name: none given Twitter: @	Re: Macclesfield reaction Agree with that! Defence solid the rest poop

5th August 2017, 16.18:35	#6-0 (permalink)
WAFCExile Squad Player (info 1 & 2) (info) Joined: Oct 2004 Racecourse Spot: Real Name: Twitter: @	Re: Macclesfield reaction It wasn't great, but it wasn't terrible. Too many backs to goal in midfield. When we did create chances from crosses, they weren't finished. Macclesfield did almost nothing apart from the goal, which was Dunn's error. Ref didn't help. Still disappointing, but at least there's promise. Rutherford MoM for me. Posted via mobile theme

5th August 2017, 16.18:38	#7-0 (permalink)
Foxy Part Time ITV4 Pundit Joined: Dec 2011 Racecourse Spot: none given Real Name: none given Twitter: @	Re: Macclesfield reaction Not bad when players in midfield pushed forward in the second half. In the first half wedgebury and Carrington were both playing too deep. Some serious questions though: Why did we spend money on a mediocre right back who isn't as good as Carrington ? Why is Carrington first choice in midfield when it's been shown on many occasions that that isn't his position ? The fact that he plays the same sitting role as Wedgebury makes this even more baffling ?

5th August 2017, 16.19:12	#8-0 (permalink)
Deeside Dragon Squad Player Joined: Oct 2009 Racecourse Spot: none given Real Name: Gaz Twitter: @	Re: Macclesfield reaction Not going to get to disheartened after 1 match, but we've got a few tricky matches coming up against sides who are likely to midway. If is't more of the same then I'll worry.

5th August 2017, 16.19:49	#9-0 (permalink)
NedStarksGhost Cult Hero Joined: Sep 2013 Racecourse Spot: Yale Real Name: none given Twitter: @	Re: Macclesfield reaction Potential is there. Wasn't expecting a win. Some great movement and link up play. Final third needs a fair bit of work. But feel fairly positive going forward. Kelly is wasted on the wing though.