Ratings vs Macclesfield

[standingroomonly2]

Originally Posted by [Removed User

;2057633]Why do people think that Boden, Holroyd or Massanka will score from crosses? None of them are capable of winning a clear header. The issue is not getting crosses in. It's why are we not playing them in from central midfield so they get the ball to feet as they run through.

Of course crosses have to result in headers. Whoever heard of a low cross fired in. My mistake

Edit. Shit sorry I forgot it may be construed as bullying if me or onelovewrexham dare reply or even refer back to a post from the resident guru. Hope I haven't overstepped the mark!
Posted via mobile theme

[John Neals Dynasty]

I think Dunne is being a little bit harshly criticised for the goal I was in the Techend and the ball was travelling with pace Dunne went the direction it was going but the ball swerved in the air to his right and wrong footed him, I get why some think sitting in the MRS & Yale that he was to blame but if you had been in the Techend you might have a different opinion, I do think he looked hesitant in goal after that though.

Only the first game but we have to start winning at home we can't afford another season like last else the gates will start to tumble.
Posted via mobile theme

[Birdy]

Originally Posted by [Removed User

;2057638]Well you certainly overstepped something. Maybe the alcohol limit? Read my post again. You even edited your post and still didn't get my pretty basic point.

We are trying to put crosses in to players whose ability to win a clean header is negligible. Their strength is on the floor. Thus the inability of some players to get a cross in is largely irrelevant. What is relevant is that all three players need balls to feet coming from central midfield not the wing.

Low crosses, cut backs that kind of thing. I suggest you re-read football coaching for beginners volume 1 if you are struggling to understand that concept.

[standingroomonly2]

Originally Posted by [Removed User

;2057638]Well you certainly overstepped something. Maybe the alcohol limit? Read my post again. You even edited your post and still didn't get my pretty basic point.

We are trying to put crosses in to players whose ability to win a clean header is negligible. Their strength is on the floor. Thus the inability of some players to get a cross in is largely irrelevant. What is relevant is that all three players need balls to feet coming from central midfield not the wing.

Not drinking Michael. We hardly tried putting decent crosses in. And as I stated which you clearly failed to take on board, a decent cross (of which Rutherford provided zilch) doesn't have to result in our forwards competing for a header. As was shown by boden's pinpoint cross for Rutherford, and the cross for their lad to flick home but be ruled offside
Posted via mobile theme

[standingroomonly2]

Originally Posted by [Removed User

;2057641]Who's that even addressed to?' Me or him?

The f*ing irony in that is pure comedy coming from somebody who constantly fails to reply to posts properly
Posted via mobile theme

[Birdy]

Originally Posted by [Removed User

;2057641]Who's that even addressed to?' Me or him?

There's a clue in the 'quoted' reply. Do you need everything spoon fed to you Mike?

[standingroomonly2]

Originally Posted by Birdy

There's a clue in the 'quoted' reply. Do you need everything spoon fed to you Mike?

Usually quotes himself in his own replies, hence the confusion
Posted via mobile theme

[standingroomonly2]

Originally Posted by standingroomonly2

Usually quotes himself in his own replies, hence the confusion
Posted via mobile theme

As demonstrated above!
Posted via mobile theme

[standingroomonly2]

Originally Posted by standingroomonly2

As demonstrated above!
Posted via mobile theme

And again above.
Posted via mobile theme