Woking (H) Ratings

[standingroomonly2]

Originally Posted by Joblessred

Official Match ratings:

Dibble 6 very little to do.

Hurst 6 offered little going forward but defended adequately.

Jennings 6 as hurst.

Manny smith 8 our best player again. Took the Woking number 9 out of the game. Ruined the Woking game plan.

Pearson 7 no nonsense performance from our captain.

Wedgebury 6 runs his socks off but gives the ball away far too much.

Wright 5 a presence in midfield but struggled to find his own player for the full 90 minutes. Little improvement on the much criticized carrington.

Kelly 6 showed some nice touches and our most likely player to create something.

Macketh 5 not on long enough to make much impact

Massanka 5.5 mainly for effort. His game is far to inconsistent. Made some decent lay offs but far too often his first touch let's him down. Had a good chance to score and put a good ball through to Reid near the end.

Reid 5.5 looked a threat in and around the box and linked up with massanka reasonably well. A lack of support and creativity does not help any of our forwards.

Rutherford 5 "busy" as always... little final ball and always nearly on the end of a through ball.

Smith 5 not on long enough to make a difference. Did okay in the period he played.

Boden - not on long enough.

Overall it was a very scrappy, drab affair with very little quality from either team. For all those crying out for wright to replace carrington, there was very little improvement in the midfield. We are set-up not to lose games and it has zero entertainment value. We move on with three points, but we lack a Lee fowler type midfielder to dictate the pace of the game and get a team playing football. It's a shame penn didn't resign - a better footballer than wedgebury with a big presence in midfield. Hurst did better than I anticipated after seeing his performances pre-season.

It was not "much better", it was "more of the same" dull football we have become accustomed to watch in recent times. I'm hoping keates hasn't finished signing players in the current transfer window.

Official?? Wright was OFFICIALLY announced as man of the match so how can you rate him the worst?
Posted via mobile theme

[HugoMontenegro]

Dibble very busy in 2nd half

[REDGOG]

Much better game today

Dibble 7.5- nothing to do first half, good second half
Jennings 6 not his best game
Hurts 7 did his job looked as if he tired second half
Pearson 9 Very good
Smith 9 Very good
Wright 7.5 faded late second half, very good first half
Wedgbury 6.5 gave the ball away to much
Kelly 6 not a good game today, looked like he was rushing things
Rutherford 6 some decent crosses
Reid 8 all that was missing was a goal
Massanka 5 could have scored a couple but missed one on ones

Our strikers had the service today, but still could not score. I did enjoy the game, as we did go forward more than in previous games.

[Hamilton Pathetic]

Originally Posted by standingroomonly2

Official?? Wright was OFFICIALLY announced as man of the match so how can you rate him the worst?
Posted via mobile theme

When JoblessRed actually starts going to games, I'm sure his ratings will be more accurate.

[draig arian]

I'm sorry, I just don't understand the ratings for Nassanka .Imo, this player in all aspects of the game is a liability to the team. He tries, but unfortunately he simply has'nt got it.

[Ruabonred27]

Put a shift in ? What game were you watching ?

[Birdy]

Dibble 7
Jennings 6
Hurst 7
Pearson 8
Smith 9
Wright 7
Wedgbury 6
Kelly 5
Rutherford 5
Reid 6
Massanka 4

[pwynnej]

I'll just compare today vs my last visit to the Cae Ras...
Braintree

Better in all respects
Woking dreadful

[marathonplny]

Still lacking in the ability to beat the full backs
Have to agree - better going forward , but would still like to see more

Kelly is a good footballer - but ... not on the left side

We need 3 points on Monday now