Ratings vs Sutton

[Willywill]

Sorry, it I can't take to Rutherford. Signed as a creative winger on either flank, but hasn't got the pace to outstrip most full backs, and his selection of sideways or backwards passing frustrates the hell out of me. Apparently he worked hard today, but he reminds me of a secondary right back. Is he really the best we can get for that position?

[Hometown Unicorn]

Originally Posted by Red Light

Massanka 6 - the only player to have 2 if not 3 goal scoring opportunities - his first touch and control is very poor but he should have scored at least one, especially when he was fed by Kelly and only had the keeper to beat but didn’t even work the keeper shooting wide when it looked easier to score - BUT he had chances and got in good positions which others didn’t.

I'm calling bollocks here. He had 3 clear cut chances in front of goal and failed on every one of them. He only had the chances because he wasn't marked as heavily as Reid because Sutton knew he useless he is.

[standingroomonly2]

Originally Posted by Willywill

Sorry, it I can't take to Rutherford. Signed as a creative winger on either flank, but hasn't got the pace to outstrip most full backs, and his selection of sideways or backwards passing frustrates the hell out of me. Apparently he worked hard today, but he reminds me of a secondary right back. Is he really the best we can get for that position?

Exactly this
Posted via mobile theme

[stevewxm]

Originally Posted by TaidTom

Rutherford getting 5 and 6? Really? One of the first names on the team sheet for me at the moment.

Agree he was excellent especially tracking back - much criticised but gives everything for the team.

[Wrex4life]

Mom was rutherford! He gives everything.give me 5 rutherfords and 6 planks of woods and i would get promotion

[standingroomonly2]

Originally Posted by Wrex4life

Mom was rutherford! He gives everything.give me 5 rutherfords and 6 planks of woods and i would get promotion

You'd get a grand total of no shots on goal. Zero full backs beaten and some very frustrated planks of wood waiting in the box.
Posted via mobile theme

[WrexSi]

Originally Posted by standingroomonly2

You'd get a grand total of no shots on goal. Zero full backs beaten and some very frustrated planks of wood waiting in the box.
Posted via mobile theme

Very naughty. And I disagree. But you made me laugh for the first time in at least three days. For that, I thank you.

[ugarte007]

we should have won today

[jonesfach]

Originally Posted by TaidTom

Rutherford getting 5 and 6? Really? One of the first names on the team sheet for me at the moment.

Not a Rutherford fan but thought it was his best game for us today. His fitness levels were top drawer. Yes he is limited but the defensive work he gets through goes unnoticed.