Ratings vs Maidstone

[Foxy]

Originally Posted by Prodigal Dragon

Agree. Rutherford in particular is an enigma: if he had more composure and scored that early chance we would have been home and dry. Kelly frustrates because he cannot unlock a defence and plays too many sideways passes. On Saturday, he gave the ball away far too often, hence why I gave him a (4) - below average - and Wedgbury a (5) - average - because his passing is normally pants but he breaks up play well.

I see no harm in giving scores below (5) if they ain’t pulling their weight. Alas, that happens far too often for my liking.

Over the whole season

Dunn 6
Roberts 6
Smith 9
Pearson 9
Jennings 6
Rutherford 6
Wedgebury 7
Kelly 6
Carrington 6
Deverdics 4
Holroyd 6
Quigley 7
Boden 4
McCreth 2
Massanka 6
Wright 6

Too many 6s from regular players. Too reliant on awesome performances from the centre halves. That’s no way to be going up into league 2

[blackbrookred]

Originally Posted by Foxy

Over the whole season

Dunn 6
Roberts 6
Smith 9
Pearson 9
Jennings 6
Rutherford 6
Wedgebury 7
Kelly 6
Carrington 6
Deverdics 4
Holroyd 6
Quigley 7
Boden 4
McCreth 2
Massanka 6
Wright 6

Too many 6s from regular players. Too reliant on awesome performances from the centre halves. That’s no way to be going up into league 2

Based on 10 then 5 is average I would say. How does Massanka score the same as Holroyd?
Posted via mobile theme

[marinman]

I don't play ratings game but read the threads. Considering some of the pooor ratings given I'm surprised we're not fighting relegation. I know it's only opinion so of no real importance.

[sparky]

Originally Posted by moynkeepthefaith

Pagl - I am sure you know what I mean ! What you describe would be very rare. My point is that if a player does what is required then for me he is a 5.

I supppse the only problem with that and hence why I don't do ratings is that only those in the dressing know exactly what is required of each player. Ratings are a bit of harmless fun that shouldn't be taken to seriously.

[Superunknown]

Originally Posted by Foxy

Over the whole season

Dunn 6
Roberts 6
Smith 9
Pearson 9
Jennings 6
Rutherford 6
Wedgebury 7
Kelly 6
Carrington 6
Deverdics 4
Holroyd 6
Quigley 7
Boden 4
McCreth 2
Massanka 6
Wright 6

Too many 6s from regular players. Too reliant on awesome performances from the centre halves. That’s no way to be going up into league 2

In what universe is Massanka getting the same rating as Holroyd, for his goals alone in the first half of the season he deserves a 7.

[the spirit of 76]

Originally Posted by Foxy

Over the whole season

Dunn 6
Roberts 6
Smith 9
Pearson 9
Jennings 6
Rutherford 6
Wedgebury 7
Kelly 6
Carrington 6
Deverdics 4
Holroyd 6
Quigley 7
Boden 4
McCreth 2
Massanka 6
Wright 6

Too many 6s from regular players. Too reliant on awesome performances from the centre halves. That’s no way to be going up into league 2

Massanka 6 your taking the piss!!

[BorrasRed]

Originally Posted by Foxy

Over the whole season

Dunn 6
Roberts 6
Smith 9
Pearson 9
Jennings 6
Rutherford 6
Wedgebury 7
Kelly 6
Carrington 6
Deverdics 4
Holroyd 6
Quigley 7
Boden 4
McCreth 2
Massanka 6
Wright 6

Too many 6s from regular players. Too reliant on awesome performances from the centre halves. That’s no way to be going up into league 2

Massanka a 6 ?????? Holroyd deserves a 7 for his goal tally.

[Ddraigoch]

Is that the same Holroyd who has scored 13 goals so far and been played out on the left for a considerable part of the season. Poor even by your standards Foxy!

[KT12 Exile]

Originally Posted by Foxy

Over the whole season

Dunn 6
Roberts 6
Smith 9
Pearson 9
Jennings 6
Rutherford 6
Wedgebury 7
Kelly 6
Carrington 6
Deverdics 4
Holroyd 6
Quigley 7
Boden 4
McCreth 2
Massanka 6
Wright 6

I'd put Massanka and Dunn down to a 5, Roberts and Holroyd up to a 7 and Quigley up to an 8.
Posted via mobile theme