|
Register |
Season Two Episode Threads: S2E1 Welcome Back / S2E2 Quiet Zone / S2E3 Nott Yet / S2E4 Shaun's Vacation / S2E5 First Losers / S2E6 Ballers / S2E7 Giant Killers / S2E8 The Grind / S2E9 Glove Triangle / S2E10 Gresford / S2E11 Yn Codi / S2E12 Hand of Foz / S2E13 Family Business / S2E14 Worst Case Scenario / S2E15 Up The Town?/ |
Wrexham Talk about things related to Wrexham Football Club ! |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
19th April 2018, 11.25:46 | #226-0 (permalink) | |
retired & running a pub
|
Re: Fed up 3
Quote:
We all hear negative comments, not giving to BTB because they think the money could be stolen is a lame excuse. If they were that interested in BTB they could donate direct. We will be unlikely to afford the quality players with attitudes like the ones you allude to. Thankfully we can ignore such comments and become more determined to prove the doubters wrong. |
|
19th April 2018, 11.31:03 | #227-0 (permalink) |
First Teamer
|
Re: Fed up 3
Firstly I took a snapshot of the league when we where top to send to a friend as I doubted we would finish this way at the end of the season.
RE: trust and finance, I know we are safer than a lot of other clubs, no debt, even have money in the bank, but have to agree we are now all sick of this Sh1t division and sadly its only a larger investment with a decent wise manager that's going to get us put. Bucket collections, raffles, will not help. The board need a good hard luck at how we do this and create significant income |
19th April 2018, 11.36:59 | #229-0 (permalink) | |
Part Time ITV4 Pundit
|
Quote:
Q.R I'm not in any disagreement with your reply and if I was bothered that much I would attend or send an email, my post was just pointing out different people have different views and comments and the ones I've alluded to are old fans who mainly use it as an excuse for no longer going. Posted via mobile theme |
|
19th April 2018, 13.26:09 | #230-0 (permalink) | |
Cult Hero
|
Re: Fed up 3
Quote:
The flip side is, your argument clearly shows what a commitment is required to be on the board. I have no issues with people making valid points re the Board but those people who shout that the Board be dismissed or replaced should step up to the plate then. Or, at least make their case face to face or via e-mail and not hide under anonymity on a forum. |
|
19th April 2018, 13.28:06 | #231-0 (permalink) | |
Part Time ITV4 Pundit
|
Quote:
Posted via mobile theme |
|
19th April 2018, 15.23:51 | #233-0 (permalink) |
Cult Hero
Joined: Oct 2004
Racecourse Spot: Excellent Idea
Real Name: Yes of course I've got a real name
Twitter: @
|
Re: Fed up 3
No doubt I will be shot down in flames for this, but here goes.
I am confident the Board has the best interests of WAFC at heart. However, inevitably they are the best interests as they perceive them – i.e. that, as the club is in fans’ hands, and as the fans’ elected representatives, they are the best people to take it forward. This is where, in my humble opinion, the model falls down. In the Board’s position, it’s incredibly difficult to be objective. Whilst they undoubtedly put a lot of effort and untold hours into running the club and have to make difficult decisions all for no financial reward, they nonetheless do get rewarded in other, less tangible ways – they must do, otherwise they wouldn’t do it. Their reward comes in the opportunity to help the club they support, the occupation of a position afforded to few fans, the kudos, the seat in the Directors’ Boxes home and away etc, all shared with fellow fans with whom they build relationships and in some cases friendships. Don’t misunderstand, I’m not complaining, they need a return on the time invested in running the club. My point is, once you’ve reached that position, it would prove very difficult to give it up and become just another fan. Some will do so, but only if forced to by family circumstances, lack of time, change of job etc. I contend that few would choose to do so otherwise. …and there’s the conundrum. It’s not in their interests to change things, or consider alternative approaches – the ownership model, the make-up of the Board, unless it’s forced upon them by external circumstances. From that point of view, riding high in the Conference, particularly if an improvement on previous seasons, suits. Again, don’t misunderstand, I’m not claiming this is in any way deliberate; it’s very difficult to admit that others could do a better job than you are, particularly if you’re devoting every spare hour to the cause and desperately want the club to be successful. Unfortunately, working hard and long is not enough. A board of directors of any company needs to recognise if it has gaps in its collective skillset, identify the gaps and remedy them. I don’t pretend to have the answer. |
19th April 2018, 15.40:54 | #234-0 (permalink) | |
retired & running a pub
|
Re: Fed up 3
Quote:
The members of the football club board are appointed by the trust board because of their skill set and ability to contribute. A position of weakness was identified and filled with Phil Salmon coming on board. (He is an unelected board member) The board can make additional appointments if required. However the trust has to have a majority on the board. From what I know of the board members appointed by the trust, there is no one there who revels in the glory of the position. Whilst they do get to sit in the Directors box, It's rare that more than two "Directors" take the opportunity at away games and even then they are bound to contribute their match fee to the trust. It is not unusual to find these directors amongst the supporters. Last edited by Quay Red; 19th April 2018 at 15.41:59.. |
|
|
Season 1 Episode Threads: S1E1 Dream / S1E2 Reality / S1E3 Rebuilding / S1E4 Home Opener / S1E5 Fearless / S1E6 Hamilton! / S1E7 Wide World of Wales / S1E8 Away We Go / S1E9 Welcome Home / S1E10 Hooligans / S1E11 Sack the Gaffer / S1E12 Wins and Losses / S1E13 Worst Team in the League / S1E14 A Hollywood Distraction / S1E15 Daggers / S1E16 Hello Wembley / S1E17 Wromance / S1E18 Do or Die | |