Do you support the choice of Manager?

[John Neals Dynasty]

Originally Posted by NedStarksGhost

So people who don't agree with the appointment shouldn't come to matches and put money into the club? Pretty bad logic if you ask me.

That's the answer then gates of 2000
Posted via mobile theme

[Pieman]

I voted no as I wanted a experienced manager just my personal opinion. We've gone down the opposite route but not being in the know of the applicants I cannot further comment.

[John Neals Dynasty]

Originally Posted by louisleftboot

Everyone had a boner for Darlo 12 months ago, and Davies will be back in charge of the cones so I'm not panicking too much over those two.

But who's in charge of the ladder 😂
Posted via mobile theme

[stevewxm]

Originally Posted by NedStarksGhost

So people who don't agree with the appointment shouldn't come to matches and put money into the club? Pretty bad logic if you ask me.

Are they actually supporting the club or are they just running it down all the time, that negativity rubs off on people, criticism is very easy to type out, but can also be very harmful.
Logic works for me, if people want to change things at the club get involved, get your voice heard at the meetings that are held, or sell your house and plough your life savings into becoming a part owner, dont see many people volunteering to buy the club.

If you dont like your club and support it through issues and decisions the people running it are making, there are loads of other teams out there.

[louisleftboot]

Originally Posted by krux

Played 9 won 1 drawn 4 lost 4

'nuff said.

Yes, I am also glad they will not be managing our team anymore.

[NedStarksGhost]

Originally Posted by stevewxm

Are they actually supporting the club or are they just running it down all the time, that negativity rubs off on people, criticism is very easy to type out, but can also be very harmful.
Logic works for me, if people want to change things at the club get involved, get your voice heard at the meetings that are held, or sell your house and plough your life savings into becoming a part owner, dont see many people volunteering to buy the club.

If you dont like your club and support it through issues and decisions the people running it are making, there are loads of other teams out there.

It's giving an opinion on a forum. The point of this website is quite literally to do just that. People can say negative things, that is giving an opinion...

If fans just typing out their thoughts on this appointment rubs badly on the club and runs it to the ground then I would be extremely concerned about the club's stability.

I love the club and support it through issues. But people not agreeing with appointment the manager is hardly that is it? Jesus wept... What would be the point of being happy about every decision? All you create is a big echo chamber where nothing would get solved. And it would be pretty boring (just like the football last season).

I would argue telling fans to stop supporting the club for having a disagreement on the club's decision is more damaging.

[ugarte007]

Originally Posted by stevewxm

Not even going to vote, as this is where we are, anybody that votes no go up the road and watch jester or become an armchair premiership fan. In other words back YOUR club or feck off somewhere else !!!!

So on average if ive spent £700 per season over ten years £7000. I then vote no I should fek off somewhere else? Jog on

[TomWFC]

Voted no because, although supportive of Ricketts, I’m absolutely staggered that Davies will still work as number two.

Ricketts with his own team of staff with somw experience I’d back, but this isn’t right and I believe we’ll regret it.

Every appointment is a risk, but some are more risky than others.

Feel rather deflated and disappointed.

[Alan Attack]

It’s quite plausible not to support the choice of manager but still support Wrexham. It really is.