Advert  

Go Back   RedPassion.co.uk Wrexham FC Message Board > Wrexham



Wrexham Talk about things related to Wrexham Football Club !

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 8th June 2018, 18.52:04   #31-0 (permalink)
Squad Player
 
henry8's Avatar

 
Racecourse Spot: mold road
Real Name: none given
Twitter: @





Default Re: Sugar Daddies mean security for the Club and its fans. Correct?

Quote:
Originally Posted by wil View Post
Are there any clubs that are successful with private owners ? Just asking as it is coming across time and again that with a fan owned club there is no chance of success ( which is B.S. in my opinion), or if a club has a benefactor owner, then they will certainly go pop. Which is equally B.S.
Depends really WHO is the benefactor and WHO is the owner.
Some are genuine fans who want to help the club they love. Some are people with an ego who want to play 'manager 2018' for a while until they either get bored or run out of cash. Then you have the Vaughans and Hamiltons
Reply With Quote
Old 8th June 2018, 19.09:48   #32-0 (permalink)
retired & running a pub
 
Cenotaff's Avatar

 
Racecourse Spot:
Real Name:
Twitter: @





Default Re: Sugar Daddies mean security for the Club and its fans. Correct?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Quay Red View Post
There's a lot of fans who would applaud your persistence in promoting the model we have, me included. unfortunately for a growing minority, patience is in short supply.
I agree with you that we can succeed but feel that the club need to be a bit more open with the way they hope to achieve success.
I accept that the reserves have to be sacrificed in order to maximise funding of the first team rather than run a squad of 24 players.
I am concerned that the youth programme appears to be suffering and would like some answers to the various questions regarding coaching staff and openings for the young players to make their mark with the first team.
I'm more than satisfied that the trust and Club boards have made great strides off the field but as pointed out there is more that we can do to encourage new members to join and get involved.
It's now down to the manager and his recruitment to drive us further forward and upwards. Build a winning team and the support will increase as will the finances to further enhance the team.
Solid post this. 100%.
__________________
I saw this wino, he was eating grapes. I was like "Dude, you have to wait."
Reply With Quote
Old 8th June 2018, 20.32:56   #33-0 (permalink)
Legend
 
Vorporix's Avatar




(info)
 
Racecourse Spot: none given
Real Name: none given
Twitter: @





Default Re: Sugar Daddies mean security for the Club and its fans. Correct?

Sugar daddies for Wrexham = rocking horse shit + unicorns.

Take your pick.

I would love to be proved wrong though
Reply With Quote
Old 8th June 2018, 20.35:29   #34-0 (permalink)
Cult Hero

Not Set Click To Change

 
Racecourse Spot: ERS
Real Name: none given
Twitter: @





Default Re: Sugar Daddies mean security for the Club and its fans. Correct?

The % of failing fans owned clubs is higher than the alternative. Telford,Stockport,Chester..... That's a fair few. Successes include Pompey (although they've quickly sacked it off) and Wycombe. Cant think of any others that have been promoted.
Reply With Quote
Old 8th June 2018, 20.43:11   #35-0 (permalink)
Due a Testimonial

Not Set Click To Change

 
Racecourse Spot: none given
Real Name: none given
Twitter: @





Default Re: Sugar Daddies mean security for the Club and its fans. Correct?

Quote:
Originally Posted by REDJB View Post
The % of failing fans owned clubs is higher than the alternative. Telford,Stockport,Chester..... That's a fair few. Successes include Pompey (although they've quickly sacked it off) and Wycombe. Cant think of any others that have been promoted.
Extraordinary statement. Are you allowed to say that in the politically correct fans ownership Disneyland ?
Reply With Quote
Old 8th June 2018, 21.00:15   #36-0 (permalink)
Cult Hero

Not Set Click To Change

 
Racecourse Spot: Upper Yale
Real Name: none given
Twitter: @





Default Re: Sugar Daddies mean security for the Club and its fans. Correct?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Foxy View Post
Extraordinary statement. Are you allowed to say that in the politically correct fans ownership Disneyland ?
Everybody understands your position and your viewpoints, but I’m afraid it’s post like this that make you seem bitter and petulant. Posts such as these just perpertuate the idea of you being over-zealously against fan ownership and people always against you.

Surely something like “I currently disagree with our current model and don’t see eye to eye with those that are running things currently” would suffice?

Instead you insist with condescending, sarcastic, patronising and border-line vitriolic posts that consistently have an under-handed dig at the current ownership model and it’s limitations.

We get you’re not on board, that’s ok, the tone of your posts is often uneccessary.

Let it be, let it be...
Reply With Quote
Old 8th June 2018, 21.00:17   #37-0 (permalink)
Due a Testimonial
 
Jaded's Avatar

 
Racecourse Spot:
Real Name:
Twitter: @





Default Re: Sugar Daddies mean security for the Club and its fans. Correct?

Quote:
Originally Posted by REDJB View Post
The % of failing fans owned clubs is higher than the alternative. Telford,Stockport,Chester..... That's a fair few. Successes include Pompey (although they've quickly sacked it off) and Wycombe. Cant think of any others that have been promoted.
Ever heard of AFC Wimbledon?
Reply With Quote
Old 8th June 2018, 21.16:24   #38-0 (permalink)
Due a Testimonial

Not Set Click To Change

 
Racecourse Spot: none given
Real Name: none given
Twitter: @





Default Re: Sugar Daddies mean security for the Club and its fans. Correct?

Quote:
Originally Posted by TomWFC View Post
Everybody understands your position and your viewpoints, but Iím afraid itís post like this that make you seem bitter and petulant. Posts such as these just perpertuate the idea of you being over-zealously against fan ownership and people always against you.

Surely something like ďI currently disagree with our current model and donít see eye to eye with those that are running things currentlyĒ would suffice?

Instead you insist with condescending, sarcastic, patronising and border-line vitriolic posts that consistently have an under-handed dig at the current ownership model and itís limitations.

We get youíre not on board, thatís ok, the tone of your posts is often uneccessary.

Let it be, let it be...
Fair point, and you are right. But call your side too - they are worse by a million miles. I donít mind disagreeing and discussing with yourself, English Red, Old Paddock Man, Todd Sweeny etc. But there are a host of vitriolic and aggressive people on your side who have been consistently beyond the pale and who ultimately damage the club.
Reply With Quote
Old 8th June 2018, 21.21:44   #39-0 (permalink)
Cult Hero

Not Set Click To Change

 
Racecourse Spot: Upper Yale
Real Name: none given
Twitter: @





Default Re: Sugar Daddies mean security for the Club and its fans. Correct?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Foxy View Post
Fair point, and you are right. But call your side too - they are worse by a million miles. I don’t mind disagreeing and discussing with yourself, English Red, Old Paddock Man, Todd Sweeny etc. But there are a host of vitriolic and aggressive people on your side who have been consistently beyond the pale and who ultimately damage the club.
I wouldn’t neccessarily refer to it as being my ‘side’. I don’t have a side really, I’d like to think I can be objective and open-minded enough to give credit where it’s due, but also to give criticism where it’s deserved. Despite my support for the current model, I believe there is plenty to improve on, including some things you’ve highlighted - albeit I don’t agree with how you get it across.

You’re entitled to your opinion and have every right to express it, I just reckon if you alter the way you get it across it would carry more weight.

Of course this applies to those who over-zealously defend the current ownership model and won’t constructively criticise when it’s clearly neccessary.

Last edited by TomWFC; 8th June 2018 at 21.23:24..
Reply With Quote
Old 8th June 2018, 21.21:49   #40-0 (permalink)
Legend
 
Vorporix's Avatar




(info)
 
Racecourse Spot: none given
Real Name: none given
Twitter: @





Default Re: Sugar Daddies mean security for the Club and its fans. Correct?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Foxy View Post
Fair point, and you are right. But call your side too - they are worse by a million miles. I don’t mind disagreeing and discussing with yourself, English Red, Old Paddock Man, Todd Sweeny etc. But there are a host of vitriolic and aggressive people on your side who have been consistently beyond the pale and who ultimately damage the club.
Should have ended your post there
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools



Quick Forum Links: Wrexham Forum - WORLD CUP 2018 FORUM - Offtopic Chat - General Footy - Other Sports - Entertainment - New Posts - Live Match Threads
RP Homepage Forums List



Content is user generated and is not moderated before posting.
All content is viewed and used by you at your own risk and RP does not warrant the accuracy or reliability of any of the information.
The views expressed are those of the individual contributors and not necessarily those of RP.
IP addresses of contributors together with dates and times of access are stored.


Complaint? Please use the report post tools or contact RP to bring a post, user or thread to the attention of a site 'admin' or 'mod'.
Our privacy policy can be found here.

Select Version: PC View | Mobile RP | Dark



All times are WMT (Wrexham Mean Time). For non-town viewers the time now is 22.54:25.
Powered by vBulletinģ & Wrex the Dragons fiery breath

RedPassion.co.uk : World Famous in Wrexham



SEO by vBSEO 3.3.0 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13