Advert  

Go Back   RedPassion.co.uk Wrexham FC Message Board > Wrexham


Season Two Episode Threads: S2E1 Welcome Back / S2E2 Quiet Zone / S2E3 Nott Yet / S2E4 Shaun's Vacation / S2E5 First Losers / S2E6 Ballers / S2E7 Giant Killers / S2E8 The Grind / S2E9 Glove Triangle / S2E10 Gresford / S2E11 Yn Codi / S2E12 Hand of Foz / S2E13 Family Business / S2E14 Worst Case Scenario / S2E15 Up The Town?/


Wrexham Talk about things related to Wrexham Football Club !

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 8th June 2018, 21.00:17   #37-0 (permalink)
Taking coaching badges
 
Jaded's Avatar

 
Joined: Dec 2004
Racecourse Spot:
Real Name:
Twitter: @





Default Re: Sugar Daddies mean security for the Club and its fans. Correct?

Quote:
Originally Posted by REDJB View Post
The % of failing fans owned clubs is higher than the alternative. Telford,Stockport,Chester..... That's a fair few. Successes include Pompey (although they've quickly sacked it off) and Wycombe. Cant think of any others that have been promoted.
Ever heard of AFC Wimbledon?
Reply With Quote
Old 8th June 2018, 21.16:24   #38-0 (permalink)
Part Time ITV4 Pundit


 
Joined: Dec 2011
Racecourse Spot: none given
Real Name: none given
Twitter: @





Default Re: Sugar Daddies mean security for the Club and its fans. Correct?

Quote:
Originally Posted by TomWFC View Post
Everybody understands your position and your viewpoints, but I’m afraid it’s post like this that make you seem bitter and petulant. Posts such as these just perpertuate the idea of you being over-zealously against fan ownership and people always against you.

Surely something like “I currently disagree with our current model and don’t see eye to eye with those that are running things currently” would suffice?

Instead you insist with condescending, sarcastic, patronising and border-line vitriolic posts that consistently have an under-handed dig at the current ownership model and it’s limitations.

We get you’re not on board, that’s ok, the tone of your posts is often uneccessary.

Let it be, let it be...
Fair point, and you are right. But call your side too - they are worse by a million miles. I don’t mind disagreeing and discussing with yourself, English Red, Old Paddock Man, Todd Sweeny etc. But there are a host of vitriolic and aggressive people on your side who have been consistently beyond the pale and who ultimately damage the club.
Reply With Quote
Old 8th June 2018, 21.21:44   #39-0 (permalink)
Legend


 
Joined: Jul 2011
Racecourse Spot: Upper Yale
Real Name: none given
Twitter: @





Default Re: Sugar Daddies mean security for the Club and its fans. Correct?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Foxy View Post
Fair point, and you are right. But call your side too - they are worse by a million miles. I don’t mind disagreeing and discussing with yourself, English Red, Old Paddock Man, Todd Sweeny etc. But there are a host of vitriolic and aggressive people on your side who have been consistently beyond the pale and who ultimately damage the club.
I wouldn’t neccessarily refer to it as being my ‘side’. I don’t have a side really, I’d like to think I can be objective and open-minded enough to give credit where it’s due, but also to give criticism where it’s deserved. Despite my support for the current model, I believe there is plenty to improve on, including some things you’ve highlighted - albeit I don’t agree with how you get it across.

You’re entitled to your opinion and have every right to express it, I just reckon if you alter the way you get it across it would carry more weight.

Of course this applies to those who over-zealously defend the current ownership model and won’t constructively criticise when it’s clearly neccessary.

Last edited by TomWFC; 8th June 2018 at 21.23:24..
Reply With Quote
Old 8th June 2018, 21.21:49   #40-0 (permalink)
Printing My Own Banknotes
 
Vorporix's Avatar




(info)
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Racecourse Spot: none given
Real Name: none given
Twitter: @





Default Re: Sugar Daddies mean security for the Club and its fans. Correct?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Foxy View Post
Fair point, and you are right. But call your side too - they are worse by a million miles. I don’t mind disagreeing and discussing with yourself, English Red, Old Paddock Man, Todd Sweeny etc. But there are a host of vitriolic and aggressive people on your side who have been consistently beyond the pale and who ultimately damage the club.
Should have ended your post there
Reply With Quote
Old 8th June 2018, 21.38:57   #41-0 (permalink)
Part Time ITV4 Pundit


 
Joined: Dec 2011
Racecourse Spot: none given
Real Name: none given
Twitter: @





Default Re: Sugar Daddies mean security for the Club and its fans. Correct?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vorporix View Post
Should have ended your post there
You have clearly recognised yourself then.
Reply With Quote
Old 8th June 2018, 21.45:29   #42-0 (permalink)
Legend
 
Vambo's Avatar

 
Joined: Aug 2011
Racecourse Spot: none given
Real Name: none given
Twitter: @





Default Re: Sugar Daddies mean security for the Club and its fans. Correct?

It looks like Damian Reeves is available again after the fairly dramatic end of Shaw Lane.
__________________
comin' to the rescue
Reply With Quote
Old 8th June 2018, 23.12:35   #43-0 (permalink)
Cult Hero
 
ozzy red's Avatar

 
Joined: Oct 2004
Racecourse Spot: I wish
Real Name: Mike Roberts
Twitter: @





Default Re: Sugar Daddies mean security for the Club and its fans. Correct?

Quote:
Originally Posted by TomWFC View Post
Everybody understands your position and your viewpoints, but I’m afraid it’s post like this that make you seem bitter and petulant. Posts such as these just perpertuate the idea of you being over-zealously against fan ownership and people always against you.

Surely something like “I currently disagree with our current model and don’t see eye to eye with those that are running things currently” would suffice?

Instead you insist with condescending, sarcastic, patronising and border-line vitriolic posts that consistently have an under-handed dig at the current ownership model and it’s limitations.

We get you’re not on board, that’s ok, the tone of your posts is often uneccessary.

Let it be, let it be...
Agree entirely.

I tend to agree with what Foxy is getting at, but even I am tired of his perpetual and repetitive aggressive and patronising approach.

He is not doing his argument any favours because of the way he puts across his views.

C'mon Foxy, time to change tack, even tho your destination is obvious.
__________________
Founding member of the Reds down under.....
Reply With Quote
Old 8th June 2018, 23.17:50   #44-0 (permalink)
Cult Hero
 
ozzy red's Avatar

 
Joined: Oct 2004
Racecourse Spot: I wish
Real Name: Mike Roberts
Twitter: @





Default Re: Sugar Daddies mean security for the Club and its fans. Correct?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Foxy View Post
Fair point, and you are right. But call your side too - they are worse by a million miles. I don’t mind disagreeing and discussing with yourself, English Red, Old Paddock Man, Todd Sweeny etc. But there are a host of vitriolic and aggressive people on your side who have been consistently beyond the pale and who ultimately damage the club.
Apologies Foxy, I had a dig before I read your response.

Its a fair response and acknowledges a fair point....but the "if you cant beat them join them" point at the end is perhaps where it falls down.

I think you have valid points, are intelligent and care about the club.

A change in approach would perhaps garner more support.

Cheers
__________________
Founding member of the Reds down under.....
Reply With Quote
Old 8th June 2018, 23.22:38   #45-0 (permalink)
Part Time ITV4 Pundit
 
John Neals Dynasty's Avatar

 
Joined: Apr 2009
Racecourse Spot: ERS but missing the Kop
Real Name: none given
Twitter: @





Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by REDJB View Post
The % of failing fans owned clubs is higher than the alternative. Telford,Stockport,Chester..... That's a fair few. Successes include Pompey (although they've quickly sacked it off) and Wycombe. Cant think of any others that have been promoted.


You are an extremely naughty boy 👦 for pointing that out & you will get a jolly good talking to for it.
Posted via mobile theme
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools



Quick Forum Links: Wrexham Forum - Live Match Threads - Offtopic Chat - General Footy - Other Sports - Entertainment - New Posts - Live Match Threads
RP Homepage Forums List

Season 1 Episode Threads: S1E1 Dream / S1E2 Reality / S1E3 Rebuilding / S1E4 Home Opener / S1E5 Fearless / S1E6 Hamilton! / S1E7 Wide World of Wales / S1E8 Away We Go / S1E9 Welcome Home / S1E10 Hooligans / S1E11 Sack the Gaffer / S1E12 Wins and Losses / S1E13 Worst Team in the League / S1E14 A Hollywood Distraction / S1E15 Daggers / S1E16 Hello Wembley / S1E17 Wromance / S1E18 Do or Die |





Content is user generated and is not moderated before posting.
All content is viewed and used by you at your own risk and RP does not warrant the accuracy or reliability of any of the information.
The views expressed are those of the individual contributors and not necessarily those of RP.
IP addresses of contributors together with dates and times of access are stored.


Complaint? Please use the report post tools or contact RP to bring a post, user or thread to the attention of a site 'admin' or 'mod'.
Our privacy policy can be found here.

Select Version: PC View | Mobile RP | Dark



All times are WMT (Wrexham Mean Time). For non-town viewers the time now is 17.50:52.
Powered by vBulletin® & Wrex the Dragons fiery breath

RedPassion.co.uk : World Famous in Wrexham



SEO by vBSEO 3.3.0 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12