Airbus Reaction - Page 2 - RedPassion.co.uk

Lods · 7th July 2018, 14.15:53

Quote:

Originally Posted by Foxy

It was definitely 4231 and not a Xmas tree 4321

That's fair with Deverdics in the more forward role than Young or Carrington. However my other points still stand.

Red Light · 7th July 2018, 14.25:10

Just viewed video / photo coverage.
The second goal was scored as a tap in by Pearson after an aerial duel between their keeper and Manny Smith which the Airbus bench were claiming was a foul.

Thought Deverdics looked a different player today - more central and advanced - a much better performance.

Wrex07 · 7th July 2018, 14.43:12

Looked ok, against an airbus side missing 4 and the no 5 is a trialist centre half who is a bouncer in town. Tougher tests to come

Hawarden Red10 · 7th July 2018, 15.06:05

Thought Fondop took his goal well and his link up play looked good

gazw · 7th July 2018, 15.16:32

Too early to judge especially with limited opposition but I thought the players were understanding of the formation for the most part and had a few nice phases. It shows the work on the training ground is going well so hopefully that continues.
Posted via mobile theme

dagg · 7th July 2018, 15.35:21

Thought the pitch was rubbish, ball just bobbling about.

shimosays · 7th July 2018, 15.40:18

Difficult to judge against that level of opposition but Deverdics looked good in the central of the 3 in the 4-2-3-1 formation.
Posted via mobile theme

totesey2 · 7th July 2018, 15.50:01

Agree that it was a game of two halves, Airbus were never in it in the first half we played some good football, but we need more game time. In the second half with the younger players we created lots of chance and should have scored three or four goals, Sadly there was no one who had the ability to put the ball in the net, Airbus did come into the game a little, but never really looked like scoring. A good work out nevertheless we can only get better, However, I still believe we need another striker.

dlrwrexham · 7th July 2018, 18.04:50

Quote:

Originally Posted by Foxy

Looks like 4231 is the formation. Seemed to have a logic about it in this game , and suited Deverdics and Leo Smith in particular. Most impressed with Young - busy, always wanting the ball, never gave it away.

Worrying though is that despite the odd moment from Fondop , we seem short in terms of genuine quality up front.

I'm one who still rates young Leo,and hope he gets a chance.How and where,did he and Deverdics play?.

7th July 2018, 14.25:10	#11-0 (permalink)
Red Light Due a Testimonial Joined: Aug 2014 Racecourse Spot: none given Real Name: none given Twitter: @	Re: Airbus Reaction Just viewed video / photo coverage. The second goal was scored as a tap in by Pearson after an aerial duel between their keeper and Manny Smith which the Airbus bench were claiming was a foul. Thought Deverdics looked a different player today - more central and advanced - a much better performance.

7th July 2018, 14.43:12	#12-0 (permalink)
Wrex07 Squad Player Joined: Jul 2012 Racecourse Spot: none given Real Name: none given Twitter: @	Re: Airbus Reaction Looked ok, against an airbus side missing 4 and the no 5 is a trialist centre half who is a bouncer in town. Tougher tests to come

7th July 2018, 15.06:05	#13-0 (permalink)
Hawarden Red10 First Teamer Joined: Aug 2011 Racecourse Spot: Paddock Real Name: none given Twitter: @	Re: Airbus Reaction Thought Fondop took his goal well and his link up play looked good

7th July 2018, 15.16:32	#14-0 (permalink)
gazw Legend (info 1 & 2) Joined: Mar 2005 Racecourse Spot: MRS Real Name: Gareth Twitter: @GarethPW	Re: Airbus Reaction Too early to judge especially with limited opposition but I thought the players were understanding of the formation for the most part and had a few nice phases. It shows the work on the training ground is going well so hopefully that continues. Posted via mobile theme

7th July 2018, 15.35:21	#15-0 (permalink)
dagg Taking coaching badges (info) Joined: Dec 2006 Racecourse Spot: Cold Road Stand Real Name: G Twitter: @	Re: Airbus Reaction Thought the pitch was rubbish, ball just bobbling about. __________________ Always remember that you are absolutely unique. Just like everyone else.

7th July 2018, 15.40:18	#16-0 (permalink)
shimosays First Teamer (info 1 & 2) Joined: Mar 2006 Racecourse Spot: Paddock Real Name: Thomas Shimmin Twitter: @shimosays	Re: Airbus Reaction Difficult to judge against that level of opposition but Deverdics looked good in the central of the 3 in the 4-2-3-1 formation. Posted via mobile theme

7th July 2018, 15.50:01	#17-0 (permalink)
totesey2 Cult Hero Joined: Sep 2006 Racecourse Spot: Mold Road season ticket holder Real Name: Tom Twitter: @	Re: Airbus Reaction Agree that it was a game of two halves, Airbus were never in it in the first half we played some good football, but we need more game time. In the second half with the younger players we created lots of chance and should have scored three or four goals, Sadly there was no one who had the ability to put the ball in the net, Airbus did come into the game a little, but never really looked like scoring. A good work out nevertheless we can only get better, However, I still believe we need another striker.