Quigley
 

Instead of painting the tunnel into something as cringe worthy as will mckenzie from the inbetweeners popping his cherry. Why can’t we use that money to sign scotty. 100k upfront, 2k a week wages will seal the deal. We have the money from Danny ward, lets get it done and get out of this S hole of a league.

Re: Quigley
 

Jesus no. £100k for Quigley is mental. Blackpool signed him for only £35k and he can't even get into Port Vale's side. He wasn't even good enough when he was here last season.

Re: Quigley
 

He was in a dean keates team and still scored goals, of course he was good enough. Which of our strikers would you prefer? Or who else realistically could we sign? All roads lead to Quigley.

[QUOTE=forever_red;2196948]Instead of painting the tunnel into something as cringe worthy as will mckenzie from the inbetweeners popping his cherry. Why can’t we use that money to sign scotty. 100k upfront, 2k a week wages will seal the deal. We have the money from Danny ward, lets get it done and get out of this S hole of a league.[/QUOTE]

Just a thought. Maybe a few panels with a fire design didn't cost 100k.
[size=1][i]Posted via mobile theme[/i][/size]

Re: Quigley
 

Fk me a lot of money at this level.
For £100k would want a lot better.
Sam should be able to get someone for £50k but maybe slightly more if better quality.

Re: Quigley
 

100k for someone with 6 months left on his blackly contact plus Port Vale would have to terminate his loan

I’d rather us splash the cash on Danny Rowe

Re: Quigley
 

Tranmere chasing Rowe

Re: Quigley
 

There are other strikers than Quigley, you know. Again, this mad obsession of bringing back former players...

Re: Quigley
 

Thank God you aren't in charge of player recruitment or finance at the club.
[size=1][i]Posted via mobile theme[/i][/size]