Potential Assistant managers

[Quay Red]

Originally Posted by GarryOggy

The board will appoint pagl as ceo, assistant manager in between his stint as representing Teresa May in the brexit negotiations.

Pagl has strong views. Disagree by all means but lets try not to be too Sarcastic.
I love to read opposing views and take them on board whilst still at times maintaining my own views.

[jonesfach]

Originally Posted by Quay Red

Pagl has strong views. Disagree by all means but lets try not to be too Sarcastic.
I love to read opposing views and take them on board whilst still at times maintaining my own views.

Well said opposing views should add to the debate and not be ridiculed.

[Phils-an-alki]

Originally Posted by GarryOggy

The board will appoint pagl as ceo, assistant manager in between his stint as representing Teresa May in the brexit negotiations.

Well I'd prefer him over a nodding dog or a sucker that just swallows everything and anything as gospel.

[pagl]

Originally Posted by Redrobinman

I thought one of the people most responsible for it would have to feel compelled to respond......ah well, nothing if not predictable, Pagl.

I don't post rumours or half truths, just opinions. Unfortunately I don't actually know any rumours.

We all post some degree of speculation as most of us are not party to the decision making process (just like the WST in Jan - oops) after all it is an opinions forum.

You left yourself wide open to the sarcasm and I couldn't resist - don't take it too personal as the forum is supposed to be a bit of fun as well you know.
Plus you will wake up the GOs who all think you should do the job yourself if you dare have an opinion the board may have made a mistake.

[pagl]

Originally Posted by Quay Red

Pagl has strong views. Disagree by all means but lets try not to be too Sarcastic.
I love to read opposing views and take them on board whilst still at times maintaining my own views.

Cheers QR. You know that some posts are tongue in cheek and some are very direct but its all about generating a debate and getting opinions.
No-one is right all the time and we have the diversity of unquestionable loyalty to the clubs decision making to the extreme of everything is wrong.

I do think I sit somewhere to 1 side of the middle (LOL) in that I support the WST and think that they should set the strategic aims/goals and targets but I question the WAFC structure as I don't think it works very well. Given we have been down here over 10 years then where is the reality of this?

[dolly dagger]

Originally Posted by Redrobinman

I love it how people post up rumours, half truths and speculation on here (as is their wont) and the usual suspects immediately use those things to berate and criticise the Club.

If I posted up the rumour that I’d heard about Flynn coming here as Director of Football for a 6 figure salary, those same people would be all over it saying why aren’t we spending the cash on players.

Yeah. Is negativity an addiction? Get the feeling they would still be bleating if we were 10 points clear.

[Phils-an-alki]

Originally Posted by dolly dagger

yeah. Is negativity an addiction? Get the feeling they would still be bleating if we were 10 points clear.

wum.

[dolly dagger]

Originally Posted by BillEBadass

Sadly you could be right WF16 - but don't overlook the fact that in 10 weeks time or so we could be back in the Football league.
The best defence in the National League will give us the platform - it's up to the rest to make the most of it.

Yes.This is our best chance for 5 years and maybe for another 5 years. "The rest" includes us, supporters.

[dolly dagger]

Originally Posted by Phils-an-alki

wum.

Just you.