Spencer Harris – an apology....

[RemovedUser]

Originally Posted by ozzy red

Might be a good idea....oh and it's "condescending" ...can't spell either

A word to the wise, Ozzy red....

You need to know the unwritten rules...here are some:

You can’t comment on the abilities of players, unless you’ve seen them play in person at the Racecourse. Video of players contributions in games don’t count. Unless it’s an away game and you didn’t go, then you may do so, because you can attend home games.

You can however, form very strong opinions at other goings on at the Club, based upon whatever rumours certain other people post up as gospel truth, without evidence, as long as it fits with your own bias. It’s an opinions board after all.

Every time we lose, it’s because the Board won’t spend money on quality players, Managers, coaches etc.

Opponents of the Ownership model are frothers.
Proponents are Happy Clappers.

Know that we need to sign an experienced Assistant Manager so that we can, if we hit a bad run of form, create a multi-page thread questioning what the devil he does, and how much he costs, concluding the money has been wasted.

Substitute Coach, for Assistant Manager in the above rule.

Know that it is obvious that if we signed one or more quality strikers who will score 20+ goals a season, it would make all the difference. These people can see it, why can’t the Manager, Board or Happy Cappers?

Every time we win, we’re papering over the cracks.

The Board should make every bit of information known to the fans (cash available for transfers, players wages, amount of payoffs, who we’re negotiating with for jobs at the Club, etc).

The fact that some of the fans calling for the type of information in the above rule to be available (and for change, outside investment etc), are self confessed Non members of the WST, and thus not part owners, it is acceptable that they believe they should be privy to this kind of information, nevertheless.

When the Club call a meeting, you are not obliged to attend in order to ask for answers. You may however post on here asking others to do so for you.
If your questions aren’t asked, because you weren’t there to do so, it’s because the meeting was populated by ‘nodding dogs’ and stooges of the Board.

As a fan owned Club we are going nowhere.

We should invest significantly more into our Youth policy, even if that means that Clubs from higher up the pyramid can come along and sign up at minimal or no cost or compensation, young talent that we may have invested years in developing.

Wright and Rutherford are crap. Roberts doesn’t cross the halfway line. However his crosses into the box from wide positions are poor.

There are others rules, but I’ll let you digest the above for now.

[Phils-an-alki]

Originally Posted by Redrobinman

A word to the wise, Ozzy red....

You need to know the unwritten rules...here are some:

You can’t comment on the abilities of players, unless you’ve seen them play in person at the Racecourse. Video of players contributions in games don’t count. Unless it’s an away game and you didn’t go, then you may do so, because you can attend home games.

You can however, form very strong opinions at other goings on at the Club, based upon whatever rumours certain other people post up as gospel truth, without evidence, as long as it fits with your own bias. It’s an opinions board after all.

Every time we lose, it’s because the Board won’t spend money on quality players, Managers, coaches etc.

Opponents of the Ownership model are frothers.
Proponents are Happy Clappers.

Know that we need to sign an experienced Assistant Manager so that we can, if we hit a bad run of form, create a multi-page thread questioning what the devil he does, and how much he costs, concluding the money has been wasted.

Substitute Coach, for Assistant Manager in the above rule.

Know that it is obvious that if we signed one or more quality strikers who will score 20+ goals a season, it would make all the difference. These people can see it, why can’t the Manager, Board or Happy Cappers?

Every time we win, we’re papering over the cracks.

The Board should make every bit of information known to the fans (cash available for transfers, players wages, amount of payoffs, who we’re negotiating with for jobs at the Club, etc).

The fact that some of the fans calling for the type of information in the above rule to be available (and for change, outside investment etc), are self confessed Non members of the WST, and thus not part owners, it is acceptable that they believe they should be privy to this kind of information, nevertheless.

When the Club call a meeting, you are not obliged to attend in order to ask for answers. You may however post on here asking others to do so for you.
If your questions aren’t asked, because you weren’t there to do so, it’s because the meeting was populated by ‘nodding dogs’ and stooges of the Board.

As a fan owned Club we are going nowhere.

We should invest significantly more into our Youth policy, even if that means that Clubs from higher up the pyramid can come along and sign up at minimal or no cost or compensation, young talent that we may have invested years in developing.

Wright and Rutherford are crap. Roberts doesn’t cross the halfway line. However his crosses into the box from wide positions are poor.

There are others rules, but I’ll let you digest the above for now.

Yet, you're still here.

[wil]

Originally Posted by Redrobinman

A word to the wise, Ozzy red....

You need to know the unwritten rules...here are some:

You can’t comment on the abilities of players, unless you’ve seen them play in person at the Racecourse. Video of players contributions in games don’t count. Unless it’s an away game and you didn’t go, then you may do so, because you can attend home games.

You can however, form very strong opinions at other goings on at the Club, based upon whatever rumours certain other people post up as gospel truth, without evidence, as long as it fits with your own bias. It’s an opinions board after all.

Every time we lose, it’s because the Board won’t spend money on quality players, Managers, coaches etc.

Opponents of the Ownership model are frothers.
Proponents are Happy Clappers.

Know that we need to sign an experienced Assistant Manager so that we can, if we hit a bad run of form, create a multi-page thread questioning what the devil he does, and how much he costs, concluding the money has been wasted.

Substitute Coach, for Assistant Manager in the above rule.

Know that it is obvious that if we signed one or more quality strikers who will score 20+ goals a season, it would make all the difference. These people can see it, why can’t the Manager, Board or Happy Cappers?

Every time we win, we’re papering over the cracks.

The Board should make every bit of information known to the fans (cash available for transfers, players wages, amount of payoffs, who we’re negotiating with for jobs at the Club, etc).

The fact that some of the fans calling for the type of information in the above rule to be available (and for change, outside investment etc), are self confessed Non members of the WST, and thus not part owners, it is acceptable that they believe they should be privy to this kind of information, nevertheless.

When the Club call a meeting, you are not obliged to attend in order to ask for answers. You may however post on here asking others to do so for you.
If your questions aren’t asked, because you weren’t there to do so, it’s because the meeting was populated by ‘nodding dogs’ and stooges of the Board.

As a fan owned Club we are going nowhere.

We should invest significantly more into our Youth policy, even if that means that Clubs from higher up the pyramid can come along and sign up at minimal or no cost or compensation, young talent that we may have invested years in developing.

Wright and Rutherford are crap. Roberts doesn’t cross the halfway line. However his crosses into the box from wide positions are poor.

There are others rules, but I’ll let you digest the above for now.

Or you can just say that “ RP contributors know nothing about football” so does he mean you as well ?

[RemovedUser]

Originally Posted by Phils-an-alki

Yet, you're still here.

Just to add a modicum of balance and reason, Phil.
I’m sure you can’t have a problem with that, can you?

[Red_not_Dead]

Ha ha.. board appoint manager - shoot the board.
Manager wins 2 games unshoot board and make them gods !!

[Wrexham's Patrick Bateman]

This fan owned business will survive whilst we're a top team in whatever League we're in..Going for promotion at the top end of the table....
It won't be really tested, until we're not in that position...For instance, we get promoted to L2, but struggle, and are in danger of relegation...
Before anyone jumps, I'm not saying we would struggle. Just using that as an example .In other words, would the board be strong enough, to take the inevitable heat...

[RemovedUser]

Originally Posted by wil

Or you can just say that “ RP contributors no nothing about football” so does he mean you as well ?

That’s for Ozzy red to answer.

[TomWAFC]

Regardless of whether GH is a success, Spencer Harris should step down, the lack of transparency and the clusterf*ck of GB's appointment have lost my confidence in him, people should remember that even a broken clock is right twice a day...

[Phils-an-alki]

Originally Posted by Redrobinman

Just to add a modicum of balance and reason, Phil.
I’m sure you can’t have a problem with that, can you?

That's your opinion on yourself, of course.

I don't mind who posts on here. Why would I.

What I do find strange is when I read long posts like yours just now, that basically slag off many posters on here and the forum in general. If you disagree with as much as you say you do then why are you still here?

Its like hating a local pub and most people that drink in there yet you still go in there everyday and moan about it all.