Why can't we play 442 v Barrow & Maidstone

[Alan Attack]

Originally Posted by Funny_Old_Game

I’d rather have Beavon than Louis Moult because we are challenging at the business end with Beavon and we never were with Moult.

Hahahaha. Am I doing it right?

Nearly but your piss taking falls down when York and Vose are plying their trade in the leagues below. If you’d read the thread, the chap mentioned York and Vose, not Moult. If he’d said he’d have Moult over Beavon, I’d agree because he left us to go up the leagues and has stayed there.

We’ve had 3 managers this season and all have picked Rutherford.

[Alan Attack]

Originally Posted by Rob Edwards

Grant has played zero part in getting us to second place.
Rutherford has been a passenger all season, only keeping his place due to JMD's fall out and subsequent departure.
Beavon has played his part and always given 100%,showing touches of class along the way.
Tollitt apart we are desperately lacking matchwinners.

I agree we’re lacking match winners but we are winning matches hence our lofty league position.

[Rob Edwards]

Originally Posted by Alan Attack

I agree we’re lacking match winners but we are winning matches hence our lofty league position.

We have won a lot of matches but worried that you can only win so many games 1-0,especially at the business end of the season. Our goalscoring record is appalling and could de-rail our season if we do not think differently for once.

[John Neals Dynasty]

It wouldn't shock me if we finish equal top and lose out on winning the league on goal difference.
Posted via mobile theme

[RED2309]

Originally Posted by Alan Attack

Nearly but your piss taking falls down when York and Vose are plying their trade in the leagues below. If you’d read the thread, the chap mentioned York and Vose, not Moult. If he’d said he’d have Moult over Beavon, I’d agree because he left us to go up the leagues and has stayed there.

We’ve had 3 managers this season and all have picked Rutherford.

When Pearson came to Kings Mills Reds we asked about Rutherford. The players want him in the team and Pearson said he would be one of the first names on the team sheet - always busy never hides.

What would the managers and players know though eh!

[OneLoveWrexham]

Originally Posted by RED2309

When Pearson came to Kings Mills Reds we asked about Rutherford. The players want him in the team and Pearson said he would be one of the first names on the team sheet - always busy never hides.

What would the managers and players know though eh!

Yeah never mind the fact he’s played 40 games scored 1 goal and 4 assists as an attacking player expected to score and create goal, he’s a nice bloke a ‘chirpy’ scouser.

[Funny_Old_Game]

Been thinking for a while that Pearson runs this team. Seems it’s true.

[Phils-an-alki]

Originally Posted by RED2309

When Pearson came to Kings Mills Reds we asked about Rutherford. The players want him in the team and Pearson said he would be one of the first names on the team sheet - always busy never hides.

What would the managers and players know though eh!

Hardly going to say he doesn't create or score enough goals is he. Which is fact.

[pagl]

If players cannot switch from 433 to 442 easily then I despair.
Given our injury problems I would prefer 442 at the moment.
At least we would also have 2 forwards.