Conclusions from tonight

[Birdy]

Originally Posted by Quay Red

No one person controls the club in any way.
The nearest any individual comes to running the club affairs in the most dedicated way is Geraint.
The decision to appoint Barrow was a board decision, admittedly controversial given Barrows previous statements and his age.
Richard Ulrich was peeved that the trust board was not kept informed over the subsequent appointment of Bryan Hughes. The WST board were disappointed to lose him but it was pointed out that there was no need for the FC board to inform the WST board.
Richard did himself no favours with his aggressive questioning at the meet the manager meeting.
To say the WST board were unprepared to act is unfair, they are individuals and 11 accepted that the WAFC board had acted within their remit, so there was nothing that required action.

The usual spin and deflection tactics, it's sad how this club sounds more like a political party than a football club.

[pagl]

Originally Posted by Klaatu

sums up your post

[John Neals Dynasty]

Originally Posted by Klaatu

😉
Posted via mobile theme

[John Neals Dynasty]

Originally Posted by pagl

sums up your post

Don't let him get to you Pagl we all know you have done lots for the club and some of us understand your frustration with the amateurs in charge
Posted via mobile theme

[WrexhamO]

Originally Posted by Quay Red

No one person controls the club in any way.
The nearest any individual comes to running the club affairs in the most dedicated way is Geraint.
The decision to appoint Barrow was a board decision, admittedly controversial given Barrows previous statements and his age.
Richard Ulrich was peeved that the trust board was not kept informed over the subsequent appointment of Bryan Hughes. The WST board were disappointed to lose him but it was pointed out that there was no need for the FC board to inform the WST board.
Richard did himself no favours with his aggressive questioning at the meet the manager meeting.
To say the WST board were unprepared to act is unfair, they are individuals and 11 accepted that the WAFC board had acted within their remit, so there was nothing that required action.

I think Richard was more annoyed no one told the WST Board that Barrow had said he wanted to leave. And of course the WAFC Board should have told the ownership board that the manager was quitting!

[Phils-an-alki]

Originally Posted by Klaatu

I've said my piece in that single sentence. Think about it........

Yeah but it was from a position of ignorance.

[pagl]

Originally Posted by WrexhamO

I think Richard was more annoyed no one told the WST Board that Barrow had said he wanted to leave. And of course the WAFC Board should have told the ownership board that the manager was quitting!

Apparently not!
Unbelievable.

[pagl]

Originally Posted by Klaatu

I've said my piece in that single sentence. Think about it........

Yeh. Total shite thats what I think.

[Phils-an-alki]

The club board went rogue because they thought that someone on the WST board (yes I know there are people who are on both) was leaking info.