Holroyd and Grant not the answer upfront - Page 4 - RedPassion.co.uk

spuderz123 · 19th April 2019, 20.42:43

Quote:

Originally Posted by joe

Going to get crucified for this, but genuinely think there is a really good player in Grant, and gutted it has not worked for us.

You're an absolute tw@t but agree.

Grant was player of the season at Fleetwood and it was only down to Barton falling out (who'd have thought it eh) with him was why he was allowed to leave. Grant for the most part has been a let down but there's still a decent player in there. Holroyd on the other hand has a shit touch, doesn't work as hard as the other forwards and doesn't have that instinct.

Football's all about opinions, mine is that Grant may come good at some point but in Holroyd I just don't see it.

Red Light · 19th April 2019, 20.53:28

We have got stability back - won 3 games on the bounce and reverted to a settled team.

We are winning games - dare BH start tinkering ? I think not and expect more of the same.

I think Grant has been much better since he was recalled into the side - the other positive being that he and Holroyd are now getting sustained game time with Beavon.

I was expecting Holroyd to be withdrawn and Jennings to be brought on with Oswell but in hindsight I think BH played it safe - left the back line as it was and sacrificed the potential of Jennings getting up the left flank and getting decent crosses in - instead kept it tight at the back with priority being defence with only a goal margin - Mclashan at least got some ball up the right flank - sometimes a pair of fresh legs can provide a great outlet to relieve the defence of any pressure.

Anyway, it's a case of stick with what we already have or revert to an unknown gamble and try Spyrou or Stockton.

WrexSi · 19th April 2019, 20.57:22

Quote:

Originally Posted by spuderz123

You're an absolute tw@t but agree.

Grant was player of the season at Fleetwood and it was only down to Barton falling out (who'd have thought it eh) with him was why he was allowed to leave. Grant for the most part has been a let down but there's still a decent player in there. Holroyd on the other hand has a shit touch, doesn't work as hard as the other forwards and doesn't have that instinct.

Football's all about opinions, mine is that Grant may come good at some point but in Holroyd I just don't see it.

I’m not keen on Grant either, like a few others, but I agree, there’s a player in there, he is someone who ‘could’ bag a goal and make a difference.
I’m not sure we can say that about Holroyd, who is lightweight, anonymous, wherever the ball drops near the area he seems to move in the opposite direction somehow.
Beavon is a proper baller.
For me, my front three would be Beavon, Grant, and....
Call me bonkers
But I’d try James Jennings up there.
He is 200% effort, he runs at people, makes things happen, he gets shots away.
Just a thought.
Maybe someone has put something ‘recreational’ in my Easter egg LOL.

LlayDragon · 19th April 2019, 21.18:02

Quote:

Originally Posted by spuderz123

You're an absolute tw@t but agree.

Grant was player of the season at Fleetwood and it was only down to Barton falling out (who'd have thought it eh) with him was why he was allowed to leave. Grant for the most part has been a let down but there's still a decent player in there. Holroyd on the other hand has a shit touch, doesn't work as hard as the other forwards and doesn't have that instinct.

Football's all about opinions, mine is that Grant may come good at some point but in Holroyd I just don't see it.

Grant isn't showing anywhere near League 1 player of the season form.

If he's going to show anything close to this he needs to hurry up, we haven't got long left.

Bigmike · 19th April 2019, 22.36:04

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wrexham_fan_4eva!

I thought Holroyd done well

So do i

Danny Boy · 19th April 2019, 22.44:52

Quote:

Originally Posted by Teifi Red

Once the regular season is over, Fondop will be back and available for the play offs

I'd be tempted to do it an all!!

Nibs · 20th April 2019, 02.02:14

I think Beavon should start, he’s the best of a bad bunch. We fliped up in January, this league was there for taking. We all know what will happen in the playoffs (again!)

See you in July Wheh we will get the usual tripe;

“Massive club” “I’m here to get promotion”

Congy Red · 20th April 2019, 07.02:54

Quote:

Originally Posted by TaidTom

To be fair, they're making the best of what they've got. Tried something different against Barrow, and back-fired spectacularly. Under the circumstances, I think Hughes and Flynn are doing a great job.

Totally agree. The front three are not inspiring but as a unit they are disciplined and support their fullbacks in defence. Against nearly all teams in this league our safety first method works. Same goes for Wright. Its fashionable to slate him so why do we win with him in the engine room?

Its a fascinating option that Fondop could come back as supersub for the playoffs.

davd29 · 20th April 2019, 07.15:02

We struggle with whoever is up front and whoever’s managing so surely it comes from the coaching. We have a front 3 all with their backs to goal not 1 threaten in behind. Having said that I wouldn’t include Beavon in that, he’s our best attacking option by a country mile

19th April 2019, 20.53:28	#29-0 (permalink)
Red Light Due a Testimonial Joined: Aug 2014 Racecourse Spot: none given Real Name: none given Twitter: @	Re: Holroyd and Grant not the answer upfront We have got stability back - won 3 games on the bounce and reverted to a settled team. We are winning games - dare BH start tinkering ? I think not and expect more of the same. I think Grant has been much better since he was recalled into the side - the other positive being that he and Holroyd are now getting sustained game time with Beavon. I was expecting Holroyd to be withdrawn and Jennings to be brought on with Oswell but in hindsight I think BH played it safe - left the back line as it was and sacrificed the potential of Jennings getting up the left flank and getting decent crosses in - instead kept it tight at the back with priority being defence with only a goal margin - Mclashan at least got some ball up the right flank - sometimes a pair of fresh legs can provide a great outlet to relieve the defence of any pressure. Anyway, it's a case of stick with what we already have or revert to an unknown gamble and try Spyrou or Stockton.

20th April 2019, 02.02:14	#34-0 (permalink)
Nibs First Teamer Joined: May 2016 Racecourse Spot: none given Real Name: none given Twitter: @	Re: Holroyd and Grant not the answer upfront I think Beavon should start, he’s the best of a bad bunch. We fliped up in January, this league was there for taking. We all know what will happen in the playoffs (again!) See you in July Wheh we will get the usual tripe; “Massive club” “I’m here to get promotion”

20th April 2019, 07.15:02	#36-0 (permalink)
davd29 Squad Player Joined: Nov 2004 Racecourse Spot: Real Name: Twitter: @	Re: Holroyd and Grant not the answer upfront We struggle with whoever is up front and whoever’s managing so surely it comes from the coaching. We have a front 3 all with their backs to goal not 1 threaten in behind. Having said that I wouldn’t include Beavon in that, he’s our best attacking option by a country mile