Wembley - The Board

[sparky]

Originally Posted by Alan Attack

The point I’m making is those running the club should continue doing so as opposed to wasting their time looking for people to “invest”.

They are, they have been, and look where it's got us.

[short_gog]

Originally Posted by pagl

Its more they can only see 1 way. They are firmly in the WST regardless of whether its really best for the club.

There is so much sniping and be on here it's become a massive parody.

People have agendas on both sides but mostly there are those who are politically opposed to fan ownershio, let's call them right leaning Tories, then you have those who have personal issues with the board member(s).
If you know of somebody who wants to invest money in the club which has no risk to the club then let us know, as theyre as real as unicorns. And if you think the wst/board would simply bat no risk investment away then you're even more delusional.
Get a realisttic grip.
PS If somebody shouts out the Bryn law consortia- then think if they were unwiling to put up 10k for due diligence then a) how much did they have to invest in the first place if a mere 10k was too much? and b) what were they afraid DD would uncover......

PPS yes mistakes were made on the football side, and the lack of acknowledgement is ridicilous but the answer to "what's the alternative" is never answered....

[GarryOggy]

Originally Posted by Foxy

It’s really not nonsense. There is sadly a group of people running the club who are on an ideological mission . The fortunes of the club on the pitch are very much the second priority. We will not move forward until these people are gone.

OK why give the manager money to spend in January and forecast to post a loss every year? I would love a billionaire to take over but all we get is a consortium that won't risk 5K

[Alan Attack]

Originally Posted by sparky

They are, they have been, and look where it's got us.

A well run club.

[LlayDragon]

Originally Posted by Alan Attack

A well run club.

.......off the pitch.

[sparky]

Originally Posted by Alan Attack

A well run club.

That's still playing football (if you can call it that) in the conference.

[jonesfach]

Originally Posted by Bagger Vance

I’ve just put money into a games company set up by two of my developers - I’m not anticipating a return, it’s not my motivation for doing it, satisfaction of helping someone is. Sometimes people are happy with what they have financially and seek satisfaction through achievement, fun or just challenge. You make the rather sad assumption that everyone is after the next buck, there are many people who see life in a different way.

Yes, but I think the assumption is these people with the right reasons, are ten a penny and easy to find. It is however far easier to find someone with far worse intentions. We have to be very careful that's all I am saying.

[pagl]

Originally Posted by short_gog

yes mistakes were made on the football side, and the lack of acknowledgement is ridicilous but the answer to "what's the alternative" is never answered....

What has been discussed in the main is change. An alternative is a dream and requires a lot more diligence.

Suggestions for change have been many but as you say lack of acknowledgement is ridiculous so it will stay the same.

The 2 boards think they are doing enough but its clear this isnt the case.

[ewloered]

Originally Posted by pagl

What has been discussed in the main is change. An alternative is a dream and requires a lot more diligence.

Suggestions for change have been many but as you say lack of acknowledgement is ridiculous so it will stay the same.

The 2 boards think they are doing enough but its clear this isnt the case.

A change to what though?