Bryn Law puts forward 'Gate Approval Process' changes and NDA changes

[DoomandGloom]

Originally Posted by Phils-an-alki

Now you're lying to try and make yourself not look weird. There was nothing personal at all.

Whatever, you're incapable of telling the truth so we'll disagree again. The offer stands.

[Phils-an-alki]

Originally Posted by DoomandGloom

Whatever, you're incapable of telling the truth so we'll disagree again. The offer stands.

**shivers sent down spine.

[pagl]

Originally Posted by Todd Sweeney

You can put forward proposals, vote for other people's proposals, attend AGMs and make your point, stand for election, vote for others who you believe hold your viewpoint, view the accounts in full, talk directly to board members face to face etc.

Can you name another football club, or indeed any other organisation, which gives you more of a say?

Mistakes have been made - appointing Barrow being one of them - but these events happen at any organisation, big or small.

Having made the mistake once with Barr, twice with Davies then I guess a 3rd one is par for the course. Could happen anywhere.

[Todd Sweeney]

Originally Posted by Haruki

Chester are a club that you have more of a say than us as Chester members can directly vote their elected representatives, true democracy.

And i will get in quick and say i know you will try to counter it by saying "look at the mess they got in" and yes they did but it answered your questions of naming a club that gave you more of a say.

I thought that they had now changed this? I know that Supporters Direct advise a structure like ours with two boards, and that they were looking to make a change at one point after the trouble they found themselves in.

[NottsRed]

Originally Posted by pagl

Having made the mistake once with Barr, twice with Davies then I guess a 3rd one is par for the course. Could happen anywhere.

We always find someway each season to shoot ourselves in the foot and im fully expecting it to happen again this season coming up.

As for Bryn's proposal if it can bring extra investment into the club then yes it should be properly debated. IMHO though if someone hasn't bought into the club by now then I don't thinks it going to happen anytime soon. For whatever reason whether its the club set up, whats happened previously or possible fan reaction the club just isn't an attractive option to invest into.

[pagl]

Originally Posted by NottsRed

We always find someway each season to shoot ourselves in the foot and im fully expecting it to happen again this season coming up.

As for Bryn's proposal if it can bring extra investment into the club then yes it should be properly debated. IMHO though if someone hasn't bought into the club by now then I don't thinks it going to happen anytime soon. For whatever reason whether its the club set up, whats happened previously or possible fan reaction the club just isn't an attractive option to invest into.

Unless we know BLs proposal then how can we judge?
Yes there will be conditions but there would if I win the lottery and put £1m in.
What are those conditions? They might be acceptable.

If however the WST have closed minds then nothing is acceptable other than a donation but with no voice. Hmmmmm..

[Ooh aah Paskin]

Originally Posted by pagl

Unless we know BLs proposal then how can we judge?
Yes there will be conditions but there would if I win the lottery and put £1m in.
What are those conditions? They might be acceptable.

If however the WST have closed minds then nothing is acceptable other than a donation but with no voice. Hmmmmm..

I always dream that if I won the Euromillions big, I would want to 'invest' some of it into the club. But for the level I would be talking I would want a say in how it is utilised. Not necessarily the leading role but at least involvement.

I would not therefore be donating anything. It would be interesting to see the Board's willingness to discussions if it meant giving up a section of power as clearly with that level of money involved, the NDA and meeting costs would be chicken feed to me.

[krux]

Originally Posted by Ooh aah Paskin

I always dream that if I won the Euromillions big, I would want to 'invest' some of it into the club. But for the level I would be talking I would want a say in how it is utilised. Not necessarily the leading role but at least involvement.

I would not therefore be donating anything. It would be interesting to see the Board's willingness to discussions if it meant giving up a section of power as clearly with that level of money involved, the NDA and meeting costs would be chicken feed to me.

Already got the hypothetical arrogance I see

[Ooh aah Paskin]

Originally Posted by krux

Already got the hypothetical arrogance I see

Lol, what I mean is if I was going to put £10m say into the club, paying £2000, £5000 or whatever wouldn't be an issue.

That barrier would be gone so would they still be open to discussion or will they shut it down at the stage highlighted earlier to protect their standing?