Bryn Law puts forward 'Gate Approval Process' changes and NDA changes

[crazywelsh]

Originally Posted by pagl

Moving forward needs a strategy and a plan.
It needs something we can all metaphorically maybe even financially buy into.

It has to be inclusive and bring us all together we cannot achieve bigger and better things unless we all work for the same goal and ideal.

Momentum is huge with any process (look at BTB from £4k to £50k) and we have that from last season. A good recruitment and start to the season will I hope continue that. How can we use it though thats they key OR as usual do we just complacently let it happen and pass by.

Boost the membership numbers and sell the Goldline lottery idea.

Improve communications and keep the fans informed. Sometimes its the little things that go a long way. Why cant both the WST and football boards issue monthly updates with progress (good or bad). I am sure the media would print it.

Can we really have an ownership system, do we own a share, could we start the ball rolling to buy the ground. Could we get a decent COE sponsor/investor.

It would need some volunteering but if people had a task, had a direction, felt they could make a difference I am sure there would be a few takers.

BL could be part of that.

There’s something wrong here in my opinion you could see it before this season, the board speak of leaks etc they are the worst for them! The amount of posters on here who have known something before it has happened is unreal.

The main issue we do have is, with Bryn Law we should atleast get too know who it is that was in the consortium not the board do not have to state there has been interest as that actually makes this look like the board are deciding what they want not what is best for the club.

For me truthfully I believe the WST did what was needed at a very important time and everyone associated with the club should be proud of fans achievement of saving the club, going forward however the club stuttered and unfortunately went backwards massively and that’s the issue overall. The WST should if this season is a failure look for a buyer recoup some of the money back into the wst account and wait on the sidelines if the club were too ever need safeguarding again, but in the process retaining a seat on the board.

I think the original plan of steadying the ship is what was needed, that has been achieved now the membership for instance it hasn’t drastically changed in years and probably never will, the shares aren’t shares when the same people making decisions don’t listen too anyone it’s been repeated mistakes often the same ones.

[Willywill]

Ditto Crazywelsh. The fans and the Trust have saved us when we were in our hour of need. We can never forget that. They have given us great stability to build on. The eleven years in the fifth tier were not a total waste, but now is the time to push on. Bryn Law is yet another committed fan who wants to see us progress and so the board should take him seriously.
If we do move on from the present system of control, I will thank the Trust/Board for what they have achieved and also for what we can and should be doing in the future. The present co operative system of ownership has served its purpose, but it’s now close to expiry.

[DoomandGloom]

Firstly, 7 with the trust.
Next, what is there to suggest he's not been taken seriously?
Lastly, as I see it, the fans will vote and decide if they want Bryn's changes, that's what fan ownership is about. Nice that we have the luxury of being able to influence these decisions.

[John Neals Dynasty]

Originally Posted by DoomandGloom

Firstly, 7 with the trust.
Next, what is there to suggest he's not been taken seriously?
Lastly, as I see it, the fans will vote and decide if they want Bryn's changes, that's what fan ownership is about. Nice that we have the luxury of being able to influence these decisions.

The problem their is the fans are treated like mushrooms, the club information is all through rumour, it's become like a private secret sect of in the know, a select few mates getting told things second hand.

We all know how rumours always change as they go along the line and get contorted.

As times gone on under fan ownership it's the fans who are kept in the dark, just a few of those at the top band of merry men know and we see them on here.

If us the fans are the owners we should be kept more informed unless it's something best not in the open for obvious security reasons.
Posted via mobile theme

[cardiffred]

Originally Posted by John Neals Dynasty

Of course not where in my post did I say that?
Posted via mobile theme

That's what Bryn Law's amendment would result in.

[cardiffred]

Originally Posted by crazywelsh

The main issue we do have is, with Bryn Law we should atleast get too know who it is that was in the consortium not the board do not have to state there has been interest as that actually makes this look like the board are deciding what they want not what is best for the club.

What's the point of the board then?

[crazywelsh]

Originally Posted by cardiffred

What's the point of the board then?

The board are representation of the fans not directors, they won’t want anyone else in as they will be out! It’s about time they stopped man handling eachother and actually looked at the future of the club, they could set it up for success aslong as the right buyer were there.

I guarantee you the board just outright said no too Bryn law consortium, why else do you think he’s asking for change and subsequently quit. He knew what the board had done it was plain and simple.

[moynkeepthefaith]

Originally Posted by crazywelsh

The board are representation of the fans not directors, they won’t want anyone else in as they will be out! It’s about time they stopped man handling eachother and actually looked at the future of the club, they could set it up for success aslong as the right buyer were there.

I guarantee you the board just outright said no too Bryn law consortium, why else do you think he’s asking for change and subsequently quit. He knew what the board had done it was plain and simple.

Guarantee ?

[tokyored]

Originally Posted by crazywelsh

I guarantee you the board just outright said no too Bryn law consortium, why else do you think he’s asking for change and subsequently quit. He knew what the board had done it was plain and simple.

There's no guarantee of anything as the 'bid' didn't even reach stage 2 of the process as they were advised not to sign the NDA.

Bryn also stood down over 2 years ago so it had nothing to do with the consortium.