Jaaskelainen set to leave

[pagl]

Originally Posted by Teifi Red

So, in post #94 it was a fact and by post #112 it was an assumption. I just wish people wouldn’t post, and make false accusations, as if things were factual only to then say they were assumptions.
It does nothing but create animosity and allows fiction to become factual.
That is dangerous.

Its as dangerous as lack of communication and transparency.
That in part leads to rumour and assumption.

If a player signs an extension why would you not inform the fans?
Especially Pearson and Manny.

Maybe you should wish the football board could communicate and avoid false accusations or in a lot of cases the actual truth even if you fail to believe it.

[Teifi Red]

I’m agreeing with above posters re failures by the board including keeping contract signings in the dark.
All i’m arguing is this propensity to post claims as fact when they’re nothing more than assumptions.
As someone points out on here often, it is a forum for opinions.
That is different from the the facts/assumptions angle.

[Percy Sugden]

Originally Posted by Teifi Red

On 10/09/18 it was mentioned that both Manny and Pearson had been offered 2 year extensions which had been agreed. These must have been in the pipeline for at least a week or two.
On 11/09/18 BBC online report Manny likely to be out for 9 to 10 weeks.

On a recent thread, a poster on here who knew about the offer on a striker who had verbally agreed to join us but was on holiday and knew before anyone else about McIntosh signing ( which points to being “in the know”) mentioned that Manny had signed his contract extension before he got injured.

Originally Posted by Teifi Red

I’m agreeing with above posters re failures by the board including keeping contract signings in the dark.
All i’m arguing is this propensity to post claims as fact when they’re nothing more than assumptions.
As someone points out on here often, it is a forum for opinions.
That is different from the the facts/assumptions angle.

Is your point in bold above fact or an assumption that a poster “in the know” is actually “in the know”?

[Teifi Red]

Originally Posted by Percy Sugden

[/B]



Is your point in bold above fact or an assumption that a poster “in the know” is actually “in the know”?

I’ll play your game by deflecting here.
Was your point re the board giving a contract to an injured player fact (as you initially claimed) or assumption ( which you later claimed)?

But, to answer your question the poster I refer to has recently been spot on with their info on signings which tends to give his entries more weight than the ones you post.
Settle the argument and give us the date Manny signed his extended contract.

[GarryOggy]

Originally Posted by pricey

Who is the idiot handing out these ludicrous long term contracts? Grant, Barrow, Manny Smith, Bryan Hughes. Theres a pattern here.

You would rather one year contracts of the Mills era then?

[Percy Sugden]

Originally Posted by Teifi Red

I’ll play your game by deflecting here.
Was your point re the board giving a contract to an injured player fact (as you initially claimed) or assumption ( which you later claimed)?

But, to answer your question the poster I refer to has recently been spot on with their info on signings which tends to give his entries more weight than the ones you post.
Settle the argument and give us the date Manny signed his extended contract.

It’s okay for you to work on the assumptions another poster is “in the know”.

Manny was injured nearly all season and the board didn’t announce his contract extension, so I’m quite confident my assumption is factual. Nobody seems to be able to provide any input to prove otherwise.

[pagl]

So again we knew he was going.
Do we have a replacement lined up.

Maybe we need someone in the board who has experience in recruiting people

[dagg]

I thought this thread was about Jaaskelainen.