New Kop stand and conference venue in Wrexham master plan

[fezbob]

Originally Posted by Vambo

You have to wonder how that can possibly have been allowed to happen, and how much it's costing.

To be fair to the council, the original LDP was thrown out because the Welsh Government appointed planning inspectorate felt it should raise its 10-year target of 8,000 homes to 11,700. Guess how many are included in the new, apparently more acceptable one?

[Vambo]

Originally Posted by fezbob

To be fair to the council, the original LDP was thrown out because the Welsh Government appointed planning inspectorate felt it should raise its 10-year target of 8,000 homes to 11,700. Guess how many are included in the new, apparently more acceptable one?

I'm guessing less than 8000 from your post. Was 'thrown out' a bit strong and returned for revision a better description?
Has the new one been accepted, and when was the old one rejected.
Probably going way off topic here, but it is interesting and I haven't followed the story.

[EnglishRed]

No thrown out is pretty accurate

https://www.wrexham.gov.uk/english/p...pment_plan.htm

To be fair the LDP process hasn't been easy for any Council, even though it was meant to be a quicker and easier process than the previous Unitary development plans.

[Alan Attack]

Originally Posted by Vambo

I'm guessing less than 8000 from your post. Was 'thrown out' a bit strong and returned for revision a better description?
Has the new one been accepted, and when was the old one rejected.
Probably going way off topic here, but it is interesting and I haven't followed the story.

Thrown out is an accurate description! If it was returned for revision I doubt it would take years to complete.

[Rob]

Originally Posted by Vambo

I'm guessing less than 8000 from your post. Was 'thrown out' a bit strong and returned for revision a better description?
Has the new one been accepted, and when was the old one rejected.
Probably going way off topic here, but it is interesting and I haven't followed the story.

Thrown out is the terminology commonly used up here and in Cardiff over what happened.

A new one has been prepped and is due shortly for open examination, so lots of sessions in Wrexham looking at all the proposed development sites in more detail.

Everyone gets to have their say (again-ish) at that point so should be quite a Big Deal locally.

[pagl]

Originally Posted by Vambo

I'm guessing less than 8000 from your post. Was 'thrown out' a bit strong and returned for revision a better description?
Has the new one been accepted, and when was the old one rejected.
Probably going way off topic here, but it is interesting and I haven't followed the story.

Seems an old story. Not sure why from 2012 there would be no revision.
Is that date the last timeline on this?

Nice to read views that have more relevant details. If it needed to be increased then where would these extra 3,700 be then? These 200 would appear a drop in the ocean.

Happily all nothing to do with us. Seems were going to be the recipient party in all of this. I assume depending what were putting in the pot if anything.

[Alan Attack]

That’s how long the development plan process takes.

As stated, it makes sites vulnerable to development

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-48611538

[fezbob]

Originally Posted by Alan Attack

That’s how long the development plan process takes.

As stated, it makes sites vulnerable to development

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-48611538

Whoever wrote that story is most likely a genius.
Posted via mobile theme

[pagl]

Originally Posted by fezbob

Whoever wrote that story is most likely a genius.
Posted via mobile theme

Yeh. So have the WAG overturned the decision then?

This story 12 June pre-dates the leader rejected one on 1 July.