WST Vice Chair

[Quay Red]

Originally Posted by Birdy

Thats the point, you would never know.

Any serious "Investor" could easily make his intention known in the press before an approach was made. ( Leaks do occur)

[Haruki]

Originally Posted by Quay Red

Any serious "Investor" could easily make his intention known in the press before an approach was made. ( Leaks do occur)

So as owners of the club our system of being informed about information is via leaks to the press?

[Ooh aah Paskin]

Originally Posted by Haruki

So as owners of the club our system of being informed about information is via leaks to the press?

Seems like it!

[Quay Red]

Originally Posted by Haruki

So as owners of the club our system of being informed about information is via leaks to the press?

No. Not what I said. In answer to the perception that approaches arebeing kept hidden.
The interested party could easily inform the press direct before approaching the club if they thought it was being made too difficult to start negotiations of any form.
That way the fan base would know in advance of any approach.
If the approach is then made official, working through the Gateway process with the £5k deposit for Due Dilligence and the Non Disclosure agreement being signed, the trust would have to inform the membership and explain the outcome.

[Phils-an-alki]

Originally Posted by Quay Red

Any serious "Investor" could easily make his intention known in the press before an approach was made. ( Leaks do occur)

And risk getting a whole world of grief from paranoid Wrexham fans who are stuck in the past who think everyone who wants to buy a football club is a crook.

[Quay Red]

Originally Posted by Phils-an-alki

And risk getting a whole world of grief from paranoid Wrexham fans who are stuck in the past who think everyone who wants to buy a football club is a crook.

It would be transparent.
It's either that or go through the process quietly.
What would you propose?

[dixienormous]

Originally Posted by Quay Red

It would be transparent.
It's either that or go through the process quietly.
What would you propose?

I propose honesty. A clear statement from the board telling us all what we already know, outside investment is not wanted.

[Phils-an-alki]

Originally Posted by Quay Red

It would be transparent.
It's either that or go through the process quietly.
What would you propose?

Yeah it would be transparent but that doesn't mean what I said wouldn't happen. Or do you think it wouldn't happen?

What would I propose, well the WST being transparent like they claim to be for starters. I've given examples of how they haven't been transparent in my second reply to you on this thread so its backed up. So why don't we start there?
It also begs the awkward question that if they can keep player contract renewals secret (lord alone knows why they did that, they still haven't explained that one) then what else have they kept from us. Its perfectly valid now, just on the back on last January's circus act.