WST EGM - Recap of Agenda - Page 24 - RedPassion.co.uk

Ooh aah Paskin · 11th October 2019, 11.28:34

*gets popcorn*

Quay Red · 11th October 2019, 11.33:28

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phils-an-alki

You do not forward a resolution to the secretary until you have the required amount of votes.

Agreed,

Seems to me that the original call to sign up for an EGM is just to test the water.
Once a Resolution or Resolutions is /are formed then the membership should be asked if they support an EGM on the basis of those resolutions.
Only then would the 5% support be valid.

Vambo · 11th October 2019, 11.34:22

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rob

Are you saying board resolutions have had low support?

Or the EGM has high support in context?

It could of course be a further 2% of previously unengaged members raising overall engagement rates.

It's 2% Rob, if you can interpret 2% as anything other than 2% then you can probably prove we're top of the league too.

Ooh aah Paskin · 11th October 2019, 11.39:38

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vambo

It's 2% Rob, if you can interpret 2% as anything other than 2% then you can probably prove we're top of the league too.

Sure its 2%, no disputing that. Its the CONTEXT of the 2% that is important.

Vambo · 11th October 2019, 11.41:50

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ooh aah Paskin

Sure its 2%, no disputing that. Its the CONTEXT of the 2% that is important.

So in what context is 2% not 2%

Hometown Unicorn · 11th October 2019, 11.51:24

Vambo is so obviously either a board or close to one. So committed to talking this down.

Jaded · 11th October 2019, 11.51:42

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vambo

So in what context is 2% not 2%

Context that’s very little interest in the ‘democracy’ of the trust in general. I think the debacle over the motion for the second platform seemingly not getting anywhere despite being overwhelmingly approved probably hasn’t helped matters.

Quay Red · 11th October 2019, 11.53:13

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vambo

So in what context is 2% not 2%

In all fairness. The normal number of participating voters at an AGM is around 350 (I think)
If the 76 figure is correct and it is voting members it equates to 21%
It's still a bit short of the 75% needed to pass a resolution.

Rob · 11th October 2019, 12.01:58

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vambo

It's 2% Rob, if you can interpret 2% as anything other than 2% then you can probably prove we're top of the league too.

Top of the league could require 33 points.

I am saying if we had 33 points we would be top of the league, you seem to be talking in the context of the maximum possible, so would require 48 points.

Both technically right, but one more 'real' than the other.

Vambo · 11th October 2019, 12.06:39

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rob

Top of the league could require 33 points.

I am saying if we had 33 points we would be top of the league, you seem to be talking in the context of the maximum possible, so would require 48 points.

Both technically right, but one more 'real' than the other.

Brill, can you make us win the Scottish Cup too.

11th October 2019, 11.28:34	#231-0 (permalink)
Ooh aah Paskin Taking coaching badges Racecourse Spot: MRS, ex-kopite Real Name: ? Twitter: @	Re: WST EGM - Recap of Agenda gets popcorn

11th October 2019, 11.51:24	#236-0 (permalink)
Hometown Unicorn Part Time ITV4 Pundit Racecourse Spot: Real Name: Ronald McDonald Twitter: @	Re: WST EGM - Recap of Agenda Vambo is so obviously either a board or close to one. So committed to talking this down.