Are the board concerned about losing fans and money ?

[wafc1926]

Originally Posted by LL11 2AH

That’s not correct, a director can be removed from their position by a proposal at an AGM or SGM.
Posted via mobile theme

Apologies if I am wrong. Can you please explain under what circumstances we can remove them when we had no say in their installation as WAFC Directors in the first place? Makes no sense.

[pagl]

Originally Posted by LL11 2AH

That’s not correct, a director can be removed from their position by a proposal at an AGM or SGM.
Posted via mobile theme

That’s Trust board members though. The WAFC board members weren’t voted in so how are they removed?

The reality is that they have positioned themselves on this ‘2nd’ imaginary board themselves. As we saw in January they have the power and more power than WST.

My opinion is the WST have become ‘lazy’ in running the club.
There is no direction from the main board other than keeping finances in check.

[LL11 2AH]

It has nothing to do with the WST or Wrexham AFC, it is standard company law. A shareholder (members in our case) proposes a motion to remove a company director, they then get another shareholder to second the motion. It then goes to a vote at an AGM or SGM and if successful then that director is removed from their position, it’s a pretty simple process in reality.
Posted via mobile theme

[John Neals Dynasty]

It will probably have to end in the courts like FC United.

You can't run a football club with volunteers it's pathetic and amateurish.

Power corrupts and both boards will do anything to stay in control.
Posted via mobile theme

[LlayDragon]

Originally Posted by LL11 2AH

It has nothing to do with the WST or Wrexham AFC, it is standard company law. A shareholder (members in our case) proposes a motion to remove a company director, they then get another shareholder to second the motion. It then goes to a vote at an AGM or SGM and if successful then that director is removed from their position, it’s a pretty simple process in reality.
Posted via mobile theme

WST members are not company shareholders in the normal sense.

[LL11 2AH]

That’s why I put members in our case in brackets, I’m not going to go back and forth over it as that’s the process. Ask the WST Secretary and he will confirm it or ask a company law specialist and or any director of a company.
Posted via mobile theme

[LL11 2AH]

For anyone that is interested, the process is described here.

https://www.lblaw.co.uk/services-for...l-of-directors
Posted via mobile theme

[Ooh aah Paskin]

I may be being dumb here but,

Can a person be a director of the Club Board if they have been voted off the Trust Board? Ie. Do you have to be on the Trust Board to be a Club Board member?

Just wondering, because I believe some Trust board members are up for re-election next year (?) who coincidentally are also on the Club Board.

Therefore, would losing Trust Board status automatically lose Club Board status? If so, that is one avenue. If not, what's the point?

[Wreck Sam]

Part of the problem has been that the same person can sit on the 2 boards. This leads to a lack of accountability. If a WAFC board member acts in a way that is not in the interests of the club (the club and not the status quo) then the WST should act on behalf of the club to address that problem. Clearly there is reason to believe that this isn't happening. Is the club serving the WST or is the WST doing what as members we are fully entitled to demand ? The WST are custodians of our club. The WAFC board should be accountable for driving the club forward on the field... not WST matters. An honest self appraisal is needed by those on the WST and WAFC boards if any good can come from where we find ourselves. I don't believe the part time input in key areas are in the best interests of the club. The waste of our budget over the years would maybe fund a person of vision that can see beyond what we have been delivered these last 8 years.