Injuries

[dixienormous]

Originally Posted by benwilliams

There are still people like me that are genuinely in the middle, have perspective and can see good and bad in both sides!!
Posted via mobile theme

Tell me what's good about the board?

[Phils-an-alki]

Originally Posted by dixienormous

Tell me what's good about the board?

"off field"

[WREXHAM TID]

Originally Posted by Phils-an-alki

You do know that they get see the team they'll be playing against at least an hour before kick off, right?

Exactly - compared to knowing in the week who is fit and preparing accordingly in training
Posted via mobile theme

[Phils-an-alki]

Originally Posted by WREXHAM TID

Exactly - compared to knowing in the week who is fit and preparing accordingly in training
Posted via mobile theme

An hour before kick is ample time to change any tactics or preparations.
Also I think you might find teams work a lot more on what they will do rather than trying to stop certain opposition players.

Also, it doesn't seem to affect Premiership or any other clubs who analyse everything. If there was a case for not giving any injuries away they'd all be doing it. They don't.

[Quay Red]

Originally Posted by hazcabz

I have not got an attitude problem but can only presume that you are very happy with this board in place.

The club has never been more transparent. Accounts available on a regular basis at the AGM's together with predictions going forward.
Minutes of trust meetings available on the WST web site which sometimes include football matters.
Board members often available around the stadium and at away games to listen to fans views and concerns. Don't know any that hide away.
Expecting the club to issue injury updates on a regular basis, doesn't equate to lack of transparency.
Yes. Reasonably happy with the board in place.
Not happy with Keates appointment but hope it was done with the best interest of the club.
Another poster called the board a joke.
I'm still waiting for a reasoned response from him as to who the jokers are and why?
I'd love us to be more successful on the pitch and stop the petty squabbling off it which results in what appears to be a relatively minor clash with the DSA going Nuclear.
Why no one picked up the phone to sort that out, from either side, is beyond me.

Your presence at the club may be missed but I'd like to see what you would propose if you got your way and the Trust and Club board were to go.

[dixienormous]

Originally Posted by Quay Red

The club has never been more transparent. Accounts available on a regular basis at the AGM's together with predictions going forward.
Minutes of trust meetings available on the WST web site which sometimes include football matters.
Board members often available around the stadium and at away games to listen to fans views and concerns. Don't know any that hide away.
Expecting the club to issue injury updates on a regular basis, doesn't equate to lack of transparency.
Yes. Reasonably happy with the board in place.
Not happy with Keates appointment but hope it was done with the best interest of the club.
Another poster called the board a joke.
I'm still waiting for a reasoned response from him as to who the jokers are and why?
I'd love us to be more successful on the pitch and stop the petty squabbling off it which results in what appears to be a relatively minor clash with the DSA going Nuclear.
Why no one picked up the phone to sort that out, from either side, is beyond me.

Your presence at the club may be missed but I'd like to see what you would propose if you got your way and the Trust and Club board were to go.

[1AlbertKinsey]

Originally Posted by Quay Red

The club has never been more transparent. Accounts available on a regular basis at the AGM's together with predictions going forward.
Minutes of trust meetings available on the WST web site which sometimes include football matters.
Board members often available around the stadium and at away games to listen to fans views and concerns. Don't know any that hide away.
Expecting the club to issue injury updates on a regular basis, doesn't equate to lack of transparency.
Yes. Reasonably happy with the board in place.
Not happy with Keates appointment but hope it was done with the best interest of the club.
Another poster called the board a joke.
I'm still waiting for a reasoned response from him as to who the jokers are and why?
I'd love us to be more successful on the pitch and stop the petty squabbling off it which results in what appears to be a relatively minor clash with the DSA going Nuclear.
Why no one picked up the phone to sort that out, from either side, is beyond me.

Your presence at the club may be missed but I'd like to see what you would propose if you got your way and the Trust and Club board were to go.

How about the managerial merry-go-round, the dishing out of long term contracts to rookie managers and crocked players - can we have some transparency there?

[Phils-an-alki]

Originally Posted by Quay Red

The club has never been more transparent. Accounts available on a regular basis at the AGM's together with predictions going forward.
Minutes of trust meetings available on the WST web site which sometimes include football matters.
Board members often available around the stadium and at away games to listen to fans views and concerns. Don't know any that hide away.
Expecting the club to issue injury updates on a regular basis, doesn't equate to lack of transparency.
Yes. Reasonably happy with the board in place.
Not happy with Keates appointment but hope it was done with the best interest of the club.
Another poster called the board a joke.
I'm still waiting for a reasoned response from him as to who the jokers are and why?
I'd love us to be more successful on the pitch and stop the petty squabbling off it which results in what appears to be a relatively minor clash with the DSA going Nuclear.
Why no one picked up the phone to sort that out, from either side, is beyond me.

Your presence at the club may be missed but I'd like to see what you would propose if you got your way and the Trust and Club board were to go.

This transparent board that held a press conference introducing Barrow as manager to fans knowing he wanted out?

This transparent board who kept Manny's contract from us?

This transparent board that didn't have the guts to sit beside the man they appointed in his first press conference and explain their decision?

The transparent board that tells lies about the DSA to cover themselves?

They are only transparent when it suits them and when they can use it as currency to win fans over.

This transparent board that used a club legend as their fall guy and didn't even have the decency to tell him the truth?

Laughable and deluded but not unexpected.

[benwilliams]

Originally Posted by dixienormous

Tell me what's good about the board?

I do feel largely the off field stuff is good. They made the right appointments with Keates first time and Ricketts and can’t be blamed for them being poached by those higher up. They acted to get rid of Hughes quite swiftly when they could have refused to accept their mistake in appointing him.

The bad is well documented. I don’t like the way spencer conducts himself. Transparency is poor. The DSA stuff is a mess. The press conference was cringeworthy. Hughes and Barrow were poor appointments. Youth could be handled a lot better

There is balance. I’d say the bad v good is probably 70/30 in favour of bad at the moment but there also seems to be precious little we can realistically do about the bad.
Posted via mobile theme