Torquay (A) - What now ?

[Phils-an-alki]

Originally Posted by petered

Please do......

Whoosh. Try to answer my question.

If I offer an alternative on here, then what happens?

Regardless of what the alternative is, it could be sell the club or it could be replace 3 board members, doesn't really matter, what would happen next?

[Ryans the man]

Communication and transparency??

How much is given to current Manager for team strengthening?

Things are seriously spiraling downwards - loss of how many fans/lower gates = how much loss income?

who / how much if any offers of investment has there been over the WST/fan ownership?

[dragonspark]

an alternative is obvious but the current set up who have empowered their own positions,appear at least to be extremely reluctant to admit that they have taken the club as far as they can in ascendancy, as a result we are in decendancy, we have hitb the iceberg and are slowly going down, the trust are the band playing on as we slowly sink. a solution would become apparent as soon as the demi gods at the top realise that things are not too rosy, their efforts have been well meant but not effective, there must be a change in the ownership model and how decisions are made, this will have to include outside investment and any individuals who may be willing to invest will not want the current trust or board in charge of finance, would you trust them with your money, its obvious what is required and many have stated this in rp, and they are right and the current set up is decomposing Wrexham FC

[Ooh aah Paskin]

Originally Posted by Wenttoanderlechtin76

Apparently IT IS WHAT IT IS ! Is this the new WE GO AGAIN

Obviously.

[Ooh aah Paskin]

Originally Posted by petered

So criticise but offer no alternative? Sorry,dont get that philosophy.

That's called an opinion.

Offering alternatives is starting a debate.

Either are valid on a FORUM.

As Phil states, you can criticise or praise something without having to offer alternatives or solutions.

[Phils-an-alki]

Originally Posted by Ooh aah Paskin

That's called an opinion.

Offering alternatives is starting a debate.

Either are valid on a FORUM.

As Phil states, you can criticise or praise something without having to offer alternatives or solutions.

Wouldn't like to go the match with him would you?

Imagine, "Akli Wrights having a mare today" Old Petey pipes up demanding you suggest another player to replace him with or your opinion isn't valid.

[Ooh aah Paskin]

Originally Posted by Phils-an-alki

Wouldn't like to go the match with him would you?

Imagine, "Akli Wrights having a mare today" Old Petey pipes up demanding you suggest another player to replace him with or your opinion isn't valid.

Though, to be fair, going by some of Wrights performances the alternative is easy..... My answer would be 'anyone'!

[Phils-an-alki]

Originally Posted by Ooh aah Paskin

Though, to be fair, going by some of Wrights performances the alternative is easy..... My answer would be 'anyone'!

And to be fair again judging by the boards recent decision making the same answer could be said about them.

[blackbrookred]

Originally Posted by Barry Diamond

They had this with Flynn but chose the route that kept the status quo

No they didnt. The players hated Flynn.