Simon Rhodes resigns from WST board

[Phils-an-alki]

Originally Posted by Quay Red

No!
He intimates that there are people out there looking to invest.
As far as anyone is aware, we haven't had an official approach.
You could tell Bryn that you're interested in investing, you'd be in the same bracket as these so called interested parties.
If they are interested, let them approach the club. £5k for Due diligence is peanuts for a credible "investor". The interest could also be posted in the press to let fans know without breaching the rules.

You really believe the WST is open to investment don't you? Bless.

[Jaded]

Originally Posted by Quay Red

No!
He intimates that there are people out there looking to invest.
As far as anyone is aware, we haven't had an official approach.
You could tell Bryn that you're interested in investing, you'd be in the same bracket as these so called interested parties.
If they are interested, let them approach the club. £5k for Due diligence is peanuts for a credible "investor". The interest could also be posted in the press to let fans know without breaching the rules.

Quay Red, you’re normally switched on. If an investor signed an NDA, and details were leaked in the same way that Keates’s return, Reid’s signing, and Patrick’s signing, among many other things, were leaked, whose responsibility would it be to prove who was responsible for the leak? Wondering if there’s a lack of clarity over this which may put off people from signing the NDA.

[Wrexham's Patrick Bateman]

Originally Posted by Quay Red

My info is as credible as those who suggest that we have had offers.
All talk from the anti trust mob and no substance. Why don't you have a go at those who believe there's a credible "investor" to name the party.

You may well be right, I've no idea what the truth is. But when you mention the antitrust mob, you're way off. The vast percentage of the fan base just want a decent team to watch. And realise that takes money and well run club.
They also realise that means the club being taken over by somebody.
That apparently isn't an option, so they have to put up with this shambles

I hope the Board are being totally truthful about this.,because they're sitting on a time bomb if they're not.

[krux]

Originally Posted by Wrexham's Patrick Bateman

You may well be right, I've no idea what the truth is. But when you mention the antitrust mob, you're way off. The vast percentage of the fan base just want a decent team to watch. And realise that takes money and well run club.
They also realise that means the club being taken over by somebody.
That apparently isn't an option, so they have to put up with this shambles

I hope the Board are being totally truthful about this.,because they're sitting on a time bomb if they're not.

Spot on.

I am part of the anti part time regional football mob.

[-luke]

https://www.leaderlive.co.uk/sport/1...al-investment/

[Answer Release]

WST and the hangers on are very much against outside investment. They are and will continue to make that perfectly clear to any potential parties. Until they open up to a more welcoming stance, people will be put off from the outset.

They live in fear based on the past, nothing else.

If Quay Red genuinely believes there are no potential investors out there, currently known or not, then there's no hope for him!

[LlayDragon]

Originally Posted by Jaded

Quay Red, you’re normally switched on. If an investor signed an NDA, and details were leaked in the same way that Keates’s return, Reid’s signing, and Patrick’s signing, among many other things, were leaked, whose responsibility would it be to prove who was responsible for the leak? Wondering if there’s a lack of clarity over this which may put off people from signing the NDA.

Fancy someone not wanting to sign a one-sided NDA?

The nerve of it!

[Wreck Sam]

Originally Posted by LlayDragon

Fancy someone not wanting to sign a one-sided NDA?

The nerve of it!

… and its not as if a smear campaign orchestrated from what would look like official club social media accounts would happen either is it ? Clearly nobody is interested.

[GiggityGiggityGiggityGoo]

Originally Posted by Quay Red

There was a perception based on similar transfers that the payments were phased based on length of contract.
Maybe the club have been successful in getting paid in full earlier than expected. ( Just guessing)

We would have been informed within 3 working days otherwise Liverpool have broken league rules.