Sack the protestors

[dixienormous]

Originally Posted by Wink Martindale

I got there early. As much as I agree with the trust model, there has been terrible errors.
I wanted to speak to Fox/ Dixie and a few others but no one was there?
We do need to sort these issues but stop hiding behind your keyboards.

Excuse me Martin, Im a season ticket holderin the Yale and I'll talk to you at any home game, today however I had to attend my lads 8th birthday party. So, next home game where would you like to talk?

[Vambo]

Originally Posted by GiggityGiggityGiggityGoo

Did you turn up to the game today and which one did you did you attende between the FA Cup and Wales game? You still haven't answered, top red.

When people have been aiding and abetting criminal behaviour it needs outting or don't you agree? Those behind ot need outting or don't you agree? Those leaking info resulting in others being abused and info that could land the club in trouble needs outting, again don't you agree? Liverpool had a NDA on the Ward deal yet info still leaked which could have had huge financial implications but let's pretend everything all okay because a top red says so.

Aye of course I'm bitter, with how John Mills has behaved with myself and others. What did happen to RedRobinman?

It's a stupid question.
I have this vision of you sitting by your computer in your pj's, smugly rubbing your hands together saying I've got him now mum, if he says he went to the wales games I can call him a part time wxm fan, if he went to the wxm games I can call him a part time Wales fan.

Get a life you sad git and try supporting your team.

[Jaded]

Originally Posted by Vambo

The platform is in hand, you've been told that

However people who generally know what they're talking about when it comes to DSA stuff - WrexhamO, for example - seem convinced that the platform as it is currently being done doesn't actually fulfil the motion as it was voted on. (Sorry, not sure if fulfil is the right word, tired, but hopefully it's clear what I mean.) For me, this is a red flag about resolutions being treated properly.

[GiggityGiggityGiggityGoo]

Originally Posted by Vambo

It's a stupid question.
I have this vision of you sitting by your computer in your pj's, smugly rubbing your hands together saying I've got him now mum, if he says he went to the wales games I can call him a part time wxm fan, if he went to the wxm games I can call him a part time Wales fan.

Get a life you sad git and try supporting your team.

It's not, it's not me who labels people as being fans or not, by that very definition. As I said, you're as daft as a brush.

You know it's possible to support the team but not the board right?

When are we going to be told the truth on the Ward money, that lie has been torn apart, as has the Dixies due diligence before that becomes another lie taken as gospel.

[Vambo]

Originally Posted by Jaded

However people who generally know what they're talking about when it comes to DSA stuff - WrexhamO, for example - seem convinced that the platform as it is currently being done doesn't actually fulfil the motion as it was voted on. (Sorry, not sure if fulfil is the right word, tired, but hopefully it's clear what I mean.) For me, this is a red flag about resolutions being treated properly.

I really don't know the details it's all third party stuff, a bit like non attending fans commenting on games.
however, the Board have a simple instruction to follow, and should follow it, unfortunately they have to consider practical and financial issues which were not detailed in the vote whilst still delivering.
had the vote been worded something like.... Do you want 2 quality centre forwards, or this specific platform the vote may have been different.
I m not getting into a detailed argument over this, because I don't have sufficient knowledge, but I do think it is unreasonably being used as a stick to beat the board.

[baz]

Originally Posted by Jaded

Baz, do you have faith in the way the existing processes work? I did have, but the way that the motion for the 2nd platform has been treated has really shaken it.

There’s no doubt that this is a very bad thing, and not the only bad thing to have gone on - the board have had a nightmare 12-18 months in most senses and me slating the movement that is opposing them isn’t motivated by a desire to ignore those failings. It may be naive on my part but there is such an untapped number of people who don’t engage with the current processes that I still believe it’s ripe for someone who can offer the right sort of vision to actually inspire those people, and to therefore be impossible to stop. Nothing we’ve seen from the current anti-board movement, if you can call it that, is either inspiring or organised enough to do that. It’s all been too half arsed and a little opportunistic. Stuff like the issue over the platform is a stain on the club but you weren’t hearing people talking about it when the team was in the playoffs.

[GiggityGiggityGiggityGoo]

Originally Posted by baz

There’s no doubt that this is a very bad thing, and not the only bad thing to have gone on - the board have had a nightmare 12-18 months in most senses and me slating the movement that is opposing them isn’t motivated by a desire to ignore those failings. It may be naive on my part but there is such an untapped number of people who don’t engage with the current processes that I still believe it’s ripe for someone who can offer the right sort of vision to actually inspire those people, and to therefore be impossible to stop. Nothing we’ve seen from the current anti-board movement, if you can call it that, is either inspiring or organised enough to do that. It’s all been too half arsed and a little opportunistic. Stuff like the issue over the platform is a stain on the club but you weren’t hearing people talking about it when the team was in the playoffs.

Yes they were, another whom pens propaganda pieces in shag mag.

Do you agree with its editors views on Celtic fans causing trouble at the recent Rangers game, as 'magic'?

[baz]

Originally Posted by GiggityGiggityGiggityGoo

Yes they were, another whom pens propaganda pieces in shag mag.

Do you agree with its editors views on Celtic fans causing trouble at the recent Rangers game, as 'magic'?

Au contraire, I’ve spent enough time on various online communities about the club to know how hard it is to get to talk about community issues when some want to talk about first team issues only. I can only spend so much time talking about how the platform issue has got extra traction while the team’s form has been bad, because it’s obvious. The platform has been an issue for about two years that I’ve been aware of. And that’s not to belittle the issue; if you’d read my “propaganda piece” then you’ll know that I actually criticise the club for this, its desertion of the Inclusion FC, the lack of a meaningful football policy and a lack of openness over the Ricketts/Barrow/Hughes turnaround. And with no comment on Scottish football, which I have absolutely no interest in. Now don’t be a silly sod and concentrate on what people are saying rather than what you think is behind their words, it’s clearly not your strong point.

[baz]

The irony being that the above is having a go at me for saying “if you want change, get organised” rather than “get behind the board, they’re doing their best”, so I’m probably closer to this person’s views than he realises. This is the problem at the club as with much of society, so much rage in the margins while the rest of us try to work something out in between. It’s mental.