Re: Q&A REVIEW | Your thoughts, was your question answered?
 

My brain stopped working half way through Part 4. I sat in a dark room for seven hours but I still get fuzzy when I see Q&A anywhere.


Hopefully I will be OK in time for Christmas and New Year so that I can be sure of the cause of any fuzziness!

Re: Q&A REVIEW | Your thoughts, was your question answered?
 

I didnt expect any answers that made perfect sense and the bow wave of questions made me lose the will to live!

A simple apology might have been a start

Re: Q&A REVIEW | Your thoughts, was your question answered?
 

Another OG from the powers that be.
Disrespectful, conceited, evasive and condescending..... but utterly predictable.
Tic toc, it’s only a matter of time.

Re: Q&A REVIEW | Your thoughts, was your question answered?
 

I've got nothing to say to this lot until the AGM. They can't hide away from that.

Ensure you've all got memberships when it happens as you could be part of saving this club.

Re: Q&A REVIEW | Your thoughts, was your question answered?
 

The liars closed ranks and selected questions about seat shades .Fan owned lol

Re: Q&A REVIEW | Your thoughts, was your question answered?
 

Firstly I have not read any of the questions or answers . The whole idea got completely out of hand and for NWD it has clearly annoyed him even more because the answers do not suit him. For me it is very simple . We appointed a trust, voted in a board to run it , and if members don't like the board they have to be voted out. I would then expect those who vote them out to step in and do all the work of those who had left . That IMHO would not happen. There are no signs of a well organised take over process so this current fuss about the way the club is run is only serving to give some keyboard warriors potential and unnecessary heart attacks.

Re: Q&A REVIEW | Your thoughts, was your question answered?
 

How to make something that could have been really open and transparent reinforce the opposite.

Re: Q&A REVIEW | Your thoughts, was your question answered?
 

[QUOTE=fluffysheepsupporter;2328645][B]Firstly I have not read any of the questions or answers [/B]. The whole idea got completely out of hand and for NWD it has clearly annoyed him even more because the answers do not suit him. For me it is very simple . We appointed a trust, voted in a board to run it , and if members don't like the board they have to be voted out.[B] I would then expect those who vote them out to step in and do all the work of those who had left [/B]. That IMHO would not happen. There are no signs of a well organised take over process so this current fuss about the way the club is run is only serving to give some keyboard warriors potential and unnecessary heart attacks.[/QUOTE]

Astonishing. Fck me, where do you start with this?
Hasn't read any of the questions and answers but decides to go on the attack against members based on ignorance. Listen to yourself, its embarrassing.

The second part in bold. LOL. That's not how it works is it. So in your dream world, by casting your vote for who should be on the trust board (I assume you do know we cannot vote for people to be on the club board, right, the people who answered these questions?) you are then putting yourself forward for election to the trust board? So going by previous voting numbers there'd be hundreds of fans on the WST board? :bulb:

I'd suggest you go away and educate yourself on the process, because your post above is just utter bollocks from start to finish. Your last sentence says more about you and your blinkered, brain washed view. A contender for the worst post of 2019 without doubt.

Re: Q&A REVIEW | Your thoughts, was your question answered?
 

[QUOTE=fluffysheepsupporter;2328645]Firstly I have not read any of the questions or answers . The whole idea got completely out of hand and for NWD it has clearly annoyed him even more because the answers do not suit him. For me it is very simple . We appointed a trust, voted in a board to run it , and if members don't like the board they have to be voted out. I would then expect those who vote them out to step in and do all the work of those who had left . That IMHO would not happen. There are no signs of a well organised take over process so this current fuss about the way the club is run is only serving to give some keyboard warriors potential and unnecessary heart attacks.[/QUOTE]

I think that the continued avoidance of a number of probing questions has annoyed NWD rather more than the answers to the comparatively few useful ones not suiting him!

Fss, do you think Chester supporters were whining about ‘keyboard warriors’ before their Trust nearly took them out of existence? Or were they sleepwalking into near-oblivion? For me, it’s imperative that that must NOT happen to us and therefore the board have to be held to account at times. This exercise has left me more concerned than I was a week ago because there are so many questions - some of which I asked myself via NWD - that were left unanswered.