Hays Travel

[Wirral Red]

Originally Posted by Inside Left

Anyone traveling by plane is contributing to climate change.

Carbon offsetting is available , I did it for my last foreign holiday.
It might be a good idea if it was a compulsory element of every air fare.

[Hometown Unicorn]

Originally Posted by davidr

Booked a holyday in Hays travel Mold last week got 4% discount (£85).

I got told it was 5% when I popped in and they wouldn't take it off a negotiated price. Booked with TUI in the end.

[GiggityGiggityGiggityGoo]

Originally Posted by Wirral Red

Carbon offsetting is available , I did it for my last foreign holiday.
It might be a good idea if it was a compulsory element of every air fare.

Biggest scam going.

[Wirral Red]

Originally Posted by GiggityGiggityGiggityGoo

Biggest scam going.

Love your positivity , any reason for your comment.

[Phils-an-alki]

Originally Posted by Wirral Red

Love your positivity , any reason for your comment.

Why do people think you should be positive on here? Bizarre.

[Wirral Red]

Originally Posted by Phils-an-alki

Why do people think you should be positive on here? Bizarre.

Sorry , I forgot where I was.

[techender]

Genuine question on climate change.

Firstly, let me say I do believe man is having an impact here.

However, whenever there is talk about changes in global temperatures, it is always qualified by the term "hottest since records began"

I believe proper climate records began in about 1840 - which in terms of the earths existence, is the blink of an eye away.

However, evidence does exist of tropical forests being found across many Northern countries, and we have also got records of ice fairs being held on the Thames during the middle ages.

Surely this then indicates that the climate has changed significantly previously, and also prior to the industrial era.

Therefore is it right to say climate change is a man made phenomena that we can really influence? or is man just speeding up a natural cycle in the earth's climate which has happened previously i.e. before records began, and while we may be able to influence the speed of that change, is saying we can reverse it, really realistic?

Not a scientist and I don't even pretend to know any of the answers, but when I hear people saying this is a man made problem, I always question myself if it is.

[Phils-an-alki]

Originally Posted by Wirral Red

Sorry , I forgot where I was.

Could just answer the question?

[moynkeepthefaith]

Originally Posted by techender

Genuine question on climate change.

Firstly, let me say I do believe man is having an impact here.

However, whenever there is talk about changes in global temperatures, it is always qualified by the term "hottest since records began"

I believe proper climate records began in about 1840 - which in terms of the earths existence, is the blink of an eye away.

However, evidence does exist of tropical forests being found across many Northern countries, and we have also got records of ice fairs being held on the Thames during the middle ages.

Surely this then indicates that the climate has changed significantly previously, and also prior to the industrial era.

Therefore is it right to say climate change is a man made phenomena that we can really influence? or is man just speeding up a natural cycle in the earth's climate which has happened previously i.e. before records began, and while we may be able to influence the speed of that change, is saying we can reverse it, really realistic?

Not a scientist and I don't even pretend to know any of the answers, but when I hear people saying this is a man made problem, I always question myself if it is.

You don't have orange hair by any chance ?