|
Register |
Season Two Episode Threads: S2E1 Welcome Back / S2E2 Quiet Zone / S2E3 Nott Yet / S2E4 Shaun's Vacation / S2E5 First Losers / S2E6 Ballers / S2E7 Giant Killers / S2E8 The Grind / S2E9 Glove Triangle / S2E10 Gresford / S2E11 Yn Codi / S2E12 Hand of Foz / S2E13 Family Business / S2E14 Worst Case Scenario / S2E15 Up The Town?/ |
Wrexham Talk about things related to Wrexham Football Club ! |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
26th April 2020, 17.42:05 | #1-0 (permalink) | |
Due a Testimonial
|
WST Statement: Response to unauthorised Tweet from WST account
Tweet was: Quote:
"A Tweet was posted on the Wrexham Supporters Trust twitter feed, @WSTtweets, from an unknown source last Sunday (April 19). The content of the Tweet related to the club’s finances in 2016, and we would like to issue the following clarifications. We would also like to apologise for the delay in responding. Finance director Mark Williams, who has summarised the following points, has been extremely busy working on the submission of furlough details for club employees on behalf of the club, which obviously had to take priority. First, regarding the unauthorised access to the Twitter feed. The WST’s Twitter feed was protected by a password, with access to the account limited to a very small number of WST Officers, past and present, who had knowledge of the password. We have acted swiftly to take the necessary security measures to protect the account and reviewed the protocol with regard to it. We can confirm the security concern relates only to the Twitter feed – there has been no breach relating to wider data. Next, please see the following summary regarding the club’s financial situation in 2016. Wrexham AFC took operational control of the Racecourse Ground on August 1. The first rent payment was due on September 1 for £100,000 plus VAT. We always knew the first year was going to be a difficult trading year as we took on running costs. Not only did we have the increased costs of operating the stadium, but these were front loaded to the beginning of the operational period. At the same time, cash receipts from the stadium were spread across the year with particular weighting to May 2017, when the first concerts were held. Additionally, there were budgeted professional fees in relation to securing the lease as identified in our accounts. As a result of this small cashflow issue – relating to less than five per cent of our annual turnover, with a time span of no more than six months to cover – a bank overdraft was considered. Ultimately, it was decided this was not feasible due to general bank policy on unsecured loans to football clubs. We also considered approaching suppliers, but a lot of these suppliers only had a couple of months of history with the Football Club. A supporter had previously offered the Trust board, in confidence, financial support should it be required. The Society Board unanimously agreed in favour of approaching the supporter. This resulted in us contacting the aforementioned supporter and they agreed to support with an interest-free facility in November. The supporter in question asked that no announcement be made to respect their privacy. Everything was cleared, as expected, within the initial six months identified and as a result also by the end of the financial year – consequently, the figures did not show in the club’s accounts. Having traded through the difficult first year of taking on the stadium with front-loaded costs, the club has since not had any temporary cashflow challenges. We can only speculate as to the motives of the individual who decided to breach the Trust’s account for this purpose. We hope supporters respect the person’s anonymity and once again we thank them for their support in 2016. WST Board. |
|
26th April 2020, 17.43:22 | #2-0 (permalink) |
Printing My Own Banknotes
|
Re: WST Statement: Response to unauthorised Tweet from WST account
Copied my thoughts over from the previous thread:
"Basically it does appear to be largely true and they just didn't bother telling us at the time. No proper explanation either really - could have said we've had some trouble so had a loan without mentioning the source. Interested to see what the board had to say about our financial health in public interviews during that year?" Posted via mobile theme Last edited by fezbob; 26th April 2020 at 17.44:34.. |
26th April 2020, 17.44:31 | #3-0 (permalink) |
retired & running a pub
|
Re: WST Statement: Response to unauthorised Tweet from WST account
I thought tbey wouldn't look for any investment without a mandate. Think this just proves everything about the board. They are running the club as their own and its time to go
Posted via mobile theme |
26th April 2020, 17.48:24 | #7-0 (permalink) | |
Due a Testimonial
|
Re: WST Statement: Response to unauthorised Tweet from WST account
Quote:
Was the loan secured on anything? |
|
26th April 2020, 17.49:12 | #8-0 (permalink) |
Tipped As Manager
|
Re: WST Statement: Response to unauthorised Tweet from WST account
This makes me think there must be many more things that supporters have not been made aware of.
Intentions were good but we would never have been told about this without the hack. Supporters had a right to know |
|
Season 1 Episode Threads: S1E1 Dream / S1E2 Reality / S1E3 Rebuilding / S1E4 Home Opener / S1E5 Fearless / S1E6 Hamilton! / S1E7 Wide World of Wales / S1E8 Away We Go / S1E9 Welcome Home / S1E10 Hooligans / S1E11 Sack the Gaffer / S1E12 Wins and Losses / S1E13 Worst Team in the League / S1E14 A Hollywood Distraction / S1E15 Daggers / S1E16 Hello Wembley / S1E17 Wromance / S1E18 Do or Die | |