WST statement on loans, why not made public, and mystery tweet update

[andy buckley]

Originally Posted by GiggityGiggityGiggityGoo

Looks it and not surprised with so many with big egos. Been rumoured for a while a lot of infighting had been going on.

Why can't they just love each other it's the answer to everything

[Phils-an-alki]

Originally Posted by andy buckley

Why can't they just love each other it's the answer to everything

[Haruki]

Originally Posted by northwalian dragon

The reasoning for not “publicising” doesn’t sit right with me

What’s the excuse for not informing members at the AGM once the loan was repaid?

And when they released a statement last week that was their opportunity to “come clean” on the use of loans yet they again took the deceitful option of only explaining the loan they had already been caught out on.

[GiggityGiggityGiggityGoo]

Time for those left to stop looking to blame people and ask themselves what can we do to make things better.

[Haruki]

Originally Posted by Phils-an-alki

At least we all know who it was now.

Looks like someone was throwing hand grenades on their way out of the building

[Haruki]

Originally Posted by Phils-an-alki

No, they know full well who it was, they just can't prove it. Maybe the person who did it is some kind of IT expert and knows how to cover their tracks with this sort of thing? Who knows!

What goes around comes around I say. Members reported that data was being leaked from anonymous accounts using VPN’s eg the leak re the DSA. Pete Jones wouldn’t investigate it at the time. Perhaps if he had of done he would have identified the source and saved himself this embarrassment.

[WrexhamO]

Originally Posted by Prodigal Dragon

Just re-read it and this appears to be so. Poorly written release, IMHO, but a statement, nevertheless.

Not poorly written at all in my opinion.

Written to convey an illusion of a message that isn't there.

[jacthelad]

Originally Posted by WrexhamO

Not poorly written at all in my opinion.

Written to convey an illusion of a message that isn't there.

This.
Posted via mobile theme

[Inside Left]

Originally Posted by 3pmsaturday

Yes not suggesting for a minute Rich wasnt telling the truth. Could well be misleading.

If agreed by the trust board there would be a record (minus names) Minutes are recorded and subsequently voted on for a reason in such organisations.