Operational policy changes - views sought - Page 2 - RedPassion.co.uk

GiggityGiggityGiggityGoo · 20th May 2020, 16.06:52

Quote:

Originally Posted by Huffy

Ha ha , three wonderful preditable responses in a row

Damned if they do and damned if they dont !!

So you're perfectly fine with them asking what members would like to see and then ignoring them?

Bit of a pointless exercise asking again no?

Phils-an-alki · 20th May 2020, 16.11:12

This is definitely happening by the way. I get the doubt but this isn't just empty words this time.

I might be wrong here but I think that the EGM call and others things like the letter have forced their hand.

Foxy · 20th May 2020, 16.11:57

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phils-an-alki

This is definitely happening by the way. I get the doubt but this isn't just empty words this time.

I might be wrong here but I think that the EGM call and others things like the letter have forced their hand.

We can’t trust them. History shows that.

chef1 · 20th May 2020, 16.13:07

Lie after lie why would anyone back them still

TopCornerFergie · 20th May 2020, 16.14:11

These latest WST announcements smack of filibustering. Nothing seems to be concise anymore. Whenever there are end results, they seem so benign it's hard to tell what's actually changed.

Ideas, questions, feedback requested en masse, and then it must take weeks to pour through it all because "we've all got full time jobs as well".

It's pretty clear that this is all headed one way, seems like a desperate attempt to keep this current board alive as long as possible.

GiggityGiggityGiggityGoo · 20th May 2020, 16.14:13

Quote:

Originally Posted by Foxy

We can’t trust them. History shows that.

My thoughts exactly, don't give them an inch, otherwise they'll take a mile.

WrexhamO · 20th May 2020, 16.16:53

They sought the views of the DSA on the platform 2 focus group.

They didn't actually take any of them on board though. Even though much of our advice has since proved correct.

As far as I'm concerned they are just ticking boxes.

Phils-an-alki · 20th May 2020, 16.16:56

I completely agree we can't trust them.

The last few responses highlight a big problem. Trust for many fans has gone so many just won't bother with this sort of thing.

dixienormous · 20th May 2020, 16.18:09

I want them to fook off and let us have our club back. That's it.

20th May 2020, 16.11:12	#11-0 (permalink)
Phils-an-alki - (info 1 & 2) (info) Joined: Apr 2005 Racecourse Spot: Real Name: Twitter: @	Re: Operational policy changes - views sought This is definitely happening by the way. I get the doubt but this isn't just empty words this time. I might be wrong here but I think that the EGM call and others things like the letter have forced their hand.

20th May 2020, 16.13:07	#13-0 (permalink)
chef1 Club Captain Joined: Mar 2005 Racecourse Spot: Real Name: Twitter: @	Re: Operational policy changes - views sought Lie after lie why would anyone back them still

20th May 2020, 16.14:11	#14-0 (permalink)
TopCornerFergie Legend Joined: Apr 2011 Racecourse Spot: Tech End Real Name: Matty Twitter: @snowdonia_soc	Re: Operational policy changes - views sought These latest WST announcements smack of filibustering. Nothing seems to be concise anymore. Whenever there are end results, they seem so benign it's hard to tell what's actually changed. Ideas, questions, feedback requested en masse, and then it must take weeks to pour through it all because "we've all got full time jobs as well". It's pretty clear that this is all headed one way, seems like a desperate attempt to keep this current board alive as long as possible.

20th May 2020, 16.16:53	#16-0 (permalink)
WrexhamO Due a Testimonial Joined: Jan 2007 Racecourse Spot: MRS Real Name: Steve Gilbert Twitter: @swgilbert1964	Re: Operational policy changes - views sought They sought the views of the DSA on the platform 2 focus group. They didn't actually take any of them on board though. Even though much of our advice has since proved correct. As far as I'm concerned they are just ticking boxes.

20th May 2020, 16.16:56	#17-0 (permalink)
Phils-an-alki - (info 1 & 2) (info) Joined: Apr 2005 Racecourse Spot: Real Name: Twitter: @	Re: Operational policy changes - views sought I completely agree we can't trust them. The last few responses highlight a big problem. Trust for many fans has gone so many just won't bother with this sort of thing. Last edited by Phils-an-alki; 20th May 2020 at 16.18:16..

20th May 2020, 16.18:09	#18-0 (permalink)
dixienormous Printing My Own Banknotes Joined: Dec 2011 Racecourse Spot: Upper Yale stand, town end Real Name: Gavin Davies-Jones Twitter: @	Re: Operational policy changes - views sought I want them to fook off and let us have our club back. That's it. __________________ "We talk about it for twenty minutes and then we decide I was right." -Brian Clough