Will you be voting for the candidates?

[FieldtownRed]

Originally Posted by draigwrecsam

But it is an opportunity to register disapproval.

This.

[Jaded]

Originally Posted by fluffysheepsupporter

and

I haven't looked at their candidate statements because they all get in by default .In the circumstances asking for approval or not is pointless.

Originally Posted by draigwrecsam

But it is an opportunity to register disapproval.

Yup. I think looking at who's registering approval or disapproval is interesting. For example, as mentioned in my post further up the page, Gavin Jones is a club Director who was present at May and June's meetings, and agreed on the initial May minutes as being accurate despite the WST now acknowledging that other Directors WERE informed of Bircham's loan, meaning they were actually inaccurate.

If you're voting for Gavin Jones, then to me, you're registering your approval of his behaviour here and saying that it's okay for the board to release inaccurate minutes.

If you're not voting for Gavin Jones, then while he will obviously still get in, you're registering your disapproval and saying that to you, it's important that meetings are minuted accurately and anyone reading them can trust that stuff said in them actually happened.

Clearly, there are people of both points of view supporting the club; it'll be interesting to see what percentage of people vote for Gavin.

[RadioRed]

Originally Posted by cynprifathro

Neither Harris nor Jones got my vote!

They did not get mine either.

[dixienormous]

Originally Posted by Phils-an-alki

Only one was worth reading. The rest were mainly embarrassing.

That error ridden drivel that Gavin wrote was actually hilarious. Should be made a sticky. He should be nowhere near the running of any club, the only club i'd trust him with is a club biscuit.

[Socrates]

All candidates voted in

[Cenotaff]

Would anybody be able to PM me the link to the zoom meeting or is it the same as last week? I haven't got an email about it.