|
Register | Mark Forums Read |
Season Two Episode Threads: S2E1 Welcome Back / S2E2 Quiet Zone / S2E3 Nott Yet / S2E4 Shaun's Vacation / S2E5 First Losers / S2E6 Ballers / S2E7 Giant Killers / S2E8 The Grind / S2E9 Glove Triangle / S2E10 Gresford / S2E11 Yn Codi / S2E12 Hand of Foz / S2E13 Family Business / S2E14 Worst Case Scenario / S2E15 Up The Town?/ |
Wrexham Talk about things related to Wrexham Football Club ! |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
9th August 2020, 08.28:07 | #11-0 (permalink) | |
Due a Testimonial
|
Re: Abstentions
Quote:
Chances are that the difference between the result being carried or not is probably one person |
|
9th August 2020, 08.29:36 | #12-0 (permalink) | |
Tipped As Manager
|
Re: Abstentions
Quote:
It's clear the majority of fans want this and by not adopting the policy they are going against fans wishes, and not for the first time. |
|
9th August 2020, 08.46:16 | #13-0 (permalink) |
retired & running a pub
|
Re: Abstentions
That’s why I checked it - yes was just short of double no so 60% looked low until you realise abstentions are classed as no’s. There is a strong argument for adopting resolution R given 65.74%
__________________
If you really want to do something you will find a way, if you don't you will find an excuse. |
9th August 2020, 09.33:00 | #14-0 (permalink) |
Printing My Own Banknotes
|
Re: Abstentions
Then the meeting was null and void after the maximum 2 hours 30 minutes, as the vote to extend it was a NO by your criteria.
My argument is as absurd as yours. However, BV has a valid point.
__________________
UP THE TOWN! Those are my principles, and if you don't like them.... well, I have others. GROUCHO MARX |
9th August 2020, 09.41:49 | #15-0 (permalink) |
First Teamer
|
Re: Abstentions
An abstention is clearly neither for or against and therefore should not be included in the total number of votes cast; its simply not a vote!
Must surely be worth dropping an email to the WST so that its at least put on the agenda for their first meeting next week. Who would arbitrate in the case of the WST disagreeing with the proposal of omitting abstentions and having a recount - Supporters Direct? |
9th August 2020, 11.28:34 | #16-0 (permalink) | |
Taking coaching badges
|
Re: Abstentions
Quote:
360 votes were cast, less 33 abstentions makes 327 66% of 327 = 215.82 Yes votes cast = 215 Therefore in the above scenario it makes a significant difference. I agree with Bagger Vance’s summary of abstentions. I Abstained against one motion yesterday. I didn’t disagree with the motion but it could be deemed I have a professional conflict of interest in that area. That doesn’t mean that my vote should be counted against the motion. |
|
9th August 2020, 11.48:25 | #18-0 (permalink) | |
retired & running a pub
|
Re: Abstentions
Quote:
Secondly, irrespective of the 65.74% vote. The pass mark required was 75%. Personally think it's a good idea that should be explored, costed and re - presented for consideration. Maybe one of the players could take on this role if they were interested in coaching towards the end of their career. |
|
Thread Tools | |
|
Season 1 Episode Threads: S1E1 Dream / S1E2 Reality / S1E3 Rebuilding / S1E4 Home Opener / S1E5 Fearless / S1E6 Hamilton! / S1E7 Wide World of Wales / S1E8 Away We Go / S1E9 Welcome Home / S1E10 Hooligans / S1E11 Sack the Gaffer / S1E12 Wins and Losses / S1E13 Worst Team in the League / S1E14 A Hollywood Distraction / S1E15 Daggers / S1E16 Hello Wembley / S1E17 Wromance / S1E18 Do or Die | |