Mi-vote

[FieldtownRed]

Originally Posted by Willywill

True. My wife was not impressed when i told her of the AGM timings, and the inference that i wanted to listen in live. Shopping was squeezed in earlier to accomodate me getting into Zoom at 2pm.
"Well its not as important as work, is it?" was her response. The fact that over 2000 other Trust members didnt join zoom on Saturday, could suggest that other households had similar conversations. Or was it that they simply "could'nt be arsed La!".

Given that you could vote without needing to sit through the meeting, was there much point in attending? Easier just to read the summary on here.

Or wait for the official WST summary....

[Willywill]

I wanted to catch a glimpse of the "keano's" who see the club through rose tinted spectacles. I have been coming to the Racecourse since 1967 and I didnt recognise the majority on there. I must get out more!
I think some folks wallow in all the technicalities of running the club and being in the Trust. It bores me rigid. After watching perhaps an hour of the performance, i am more likely to get an alternative winter hobby than join that lot splitting the atom!
To conclude the Trust clan have a higher percentage of fans who love that sort of stuff, whilst most Wrexham fans i know, run a mile. Hence the low voting figures and even lower Zoom attenders.

[Phils-an-alki]

Originally Posted by griff49

For me it's common sense to attend in person and address and explain the reasoning behind your resolution. Or get someone else to do it on your behalf .

For me its common sense to read the resolution and then vote. The reasoning is explained and its all there.
This is just petty, utterly desperate nit picking with no substance for criticism whatsoever. And you're not even a member, so what on earth are you on about? You couldn't take part or vote anyway.