Keates review of Salford performance
 

Reading keates thoughts on the game, he highlights a couple of players who wernt up to it.

Clearly this would be contracted players as it wouldn't be worth mentioning a trialists wasn't up to the standard of the rest of the squad.

Anyone aware who he's pointing at? I didn't listen to the commentary, was it picked up on there?

First st thought was redmond. But he apparently had a good first game

Re: Keates review of Salford performance
 

Yeah I noticed he wasn’t happy at all with a couple. Sounded to me like one of the new boys he’s brought in.

Re: Keates review of Salford performance
 

I was surprised how happy and laid back he was. Even joking, I thought he must be happy with how things are going with his signings, then we hear the news about a possible takeover. Perhaps he knew what is hopefully coming ?

Re: Keates review of Salford performance
 

[QUOTE=wrexhamforever16;2383845]Yeah I noticed he wasn’t happy at all with a couple. Sounded to me like one of the new boys he’s brought in.[/QUOTE]

Bit concerned that Ponticelli didn't play in the Druids game, and seemingly failed to make any impression on Saturday.

Maybe he was sold the vision that he'd be the out-and-out no.9, and isn't rating competing with Yussuf, Thomas and even Bickerstaff

Re: Keates review of Salford performance
 

[QUOTE=TopCornerFergie;2384091]Bit concerned that Ponticelli didn't play in the Druids game, and seemingly failed to make any impression on Saturday.

Maybe he was sold the vision that he'd be the out-and-out no.9, and isn't rating competing with Yussuf, Thomas and even Bickerstaff[/QUOTE]

I presumed that he was only given 30 minutes because he had a knock and missed the Druids game so isn't as far along as the others.

Re: Keates review of Salford performance
 

Did you listen to the game? Ponticelli was really looking good until he got brought down, he went off injured, it wasnt serious but he picked up a knock.