Investors identity not to be revealed in Tuesday

[sparky]

Originally Posted by Rob Edwards

Pete Jones on Wrexham Fans United putting his negative oar in last night.Saying might effect Groves situation,KOP development & FAW(not that FAW are paying for the Kop). Basically trying to look for negatives as goes against his own personal fans ownership mantra.Clearly more important to Pete that Groves stays at it is and KOP moves forward than actually having a club at the end of the season. Resigned his role and stay out of this.

Coincidence that he is no longer involved and nothing has been leaked so far?

[marathonplny]

I thought that if the resolutions were voted ‘for’, then the identities would be disclosed.

I’ve clearly not read the small print

Disappointed to say the least

[kevjones1964]

One possible reason could be that if they are known and even a small number of people are not happy with who they are, they may get visited and decide the hassle is not worth it anymore.

[Quay Red]

Originally Posted by Rob Edwards

Pete Jones on Wrexham Fans United putting his negative oar in last night.Saying might effect Groves situation,KOP development & FAW(not that FAW are paying for the Kop). Basically trying to look for negatives as goes against his own personal fans ownership mantra.Clearly more important to Pete that Groves stays at it is and KOP moves forward than actually having a club at the end of the season. Resigned his role and stay out of this.

Rather than look at the comments as negative, why not properly discuss the points he raised.
Funding is more readily available to us at present as opposed to a private owner (who might be able to fund the projects himself)
Would a new owner want to finance the work on the Groves (In total estimated at £800k)
A new stand at the 'course would attract FAW funding as part contribution to the Gateway project and might not be affected by change of ownership but then again?
Why should he stay out of this discussion any more than You or I should.
Unless of course you don't believe anyone should have contradictory thoughts to yourself and some legitimate concerns, some of which have already been raised on RP.

[Quay Red]

Originally Posted by Hightown Brymbo Red

WST is now leak proof ?����

Probably because most of the trust board don't know who they are.

[dragonspark]

certain people seem to be looking for negatives, as another posted "end the nightmare" i agree, get out of the deep dark hole the club is in

[Pieman]

Originally Posted by Rob Edwards

Pete Jones on Wrexham Fans United putting his negative oar in last night.Saying might effect Groves situation,KOP development & FAW(not that FAW are paying for the Kop). Basically trying to look for negatives as goes against his own personal fans ownership mantra.Clearly more important to Pete that Groves stays at it is and KOP moves forward than actually having a club at the end of the season. Resigned his role and stay out of this.

Agree with this. Lets move forward now for a change

[Jumpersforgoalposts]

Originally Posted by dragonspark

certain people seem to be looking for negatives, as another posted "end the nightmare" i agree, get out of the deep dark hole the club is in

As long as ending the 'nightmare' does not include a 'false dawn'?

Quay Red makes some sound observations (and I am excited as anyone ,about the possibility of new owners with a purpose and a direction )

[Hightown Brymbo Red]

Originally Posted by Quay Red

Rather than look at the comments as negative, why not properly discuss the points he raised.
Funding is more readily available to us at present as opposed to a private owner (who might be able to fund the projects himself)
Would a new owner want to finance the work on the Groves (In total estimated at £800k)
A new stand at the 'course would attract FAW funding as part contribution to the Gateway project and might not be affected by change of ownership but then again?
Why should he stay out of this discussion any more than You or I should.
Unless of course you don't believe anyone should have contradictory thoughts to yourself and some legitimate concerns, some of which have already been raised on RP.

Pete can have an opinion and to be honest if these are the only negatives he can find against the potential take over then there is little to worry about..
The Groves project? Something that has no funding at present? And if as I expect the potential investors are real game changers I fully expect them to come with better options for a training ground.
And as for the Kop development? How long has this been promised? 20 years? Its pie in the sky